Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367351›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2024

Examining the impact of sleep deprivation on medical reasoning's performance among anaesthesiology residents and doctors: a prospective study.

Mathilde Ramier, Thomas Clavier, Etienne Allard, Maud Lambert, Bertrand Dureuil, Vincent Compère

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Brain connectivity changes associated with acute sleep deprivation: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hours based scheduling in neonatology: a practical approach.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mathilde RamierDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, Rouen, 76031, France.
Thomas ClavierDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, Rouen, 76031, France.
Etienne AllardDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, GHH Hospital, Le Havre, France.
Maud LambertDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, GHH Hospital, Le Havre, France.
Bertrand DureuilDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, Rouen, 76031, France.
Vincent CompèreDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, Rouen, 76031, France. Vincent.Compere@chu-rouen.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorking long consecutive hours' is common for anaesthesia and critical care physicians. It is associated with impaired medical reasoning's performance of anaesthesiology and serious medical errors. However, no study has yet investigated the impact of working long consecutive hours' on medical reasoning.

objectiveThe present study evaluated the impact of working long consecutive hours' on the medical reasoning's performance of anaesthesiology and intensive care physicians (residents and seniors).

methodsThis multicentric, prospective, cross-over study was conducted in 5 public hospitals of Normandy region. Two groups of anaesthesia and critical care physicians were formed. One was in a rest group, RG (after a 48-hours weekend without hospital work) and the other in Sleep Deprivation Group (SDG) after a 24 h-consecutives-shift. Changes in medical reasoning's performance were measured by 69-items script concordance tests (SCT) through to the two tests. Group A completed the first part of the assessment (Set A) after a weekend without work and the second part (Set B) after a 24 h-shift; group B did the same in reverse order. The primary outcome was medical reasoning's performance as measured by SCT in RG and SDG. The secondary outcomes included association between the performance with the demographic data, variation of the KSS (Karolinska sleepiness scale) daytime alertness score, the number of 24 h-shift during the previous 30 days, the vacations during the previous 30 days, the presence of more or less than 4 h consecutives hours slept, the management of a stressful event during the shift, the different resident years, the place where the shift took place (University hospital or general hospitals) and the type of shift (anaesthesia or intensive care).

results84 physicians (26 physicians and 58 residents) were included. RG exhibited significantly higher performance scores than SDG (68 ± 8 vs. 65 ± 9, respectively; p = 0.008). We found a negative correlation between the number of 24 h-shifts performed during the previous month and the variation of medical reasoning's performance and no significant variation between professionals who slept 4 h or less and those who slept more than 4 h consecutively during the shift (-4 ± 11 vs. -2 ± 11; p = 0.42).

conclusionOur study suggests that medical reasoning' performance of anaesthesiologists, measured by the SCT, is reduced after 24 h-shift than after rest period. Working long consecutive hours' and many shifts should be avoided to prevent the occurrence of medical errors.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyCross-Over StudiesInternship and ResidencySleep DeprivationAdultClinical CompetenceClinical ReasoningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansProspective StudiesWork Schedule ToleranceMedical reasoning’s performanceScript concordance testShifts

Identifiers

PMID39367351
PMCPMC11451214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.