ArticleBMC oral health2024
Vertical root fracture detection with cone-beam computed tomography in Biodentine™ filled teeth.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Diagnostic Reliability of CBCT for Vertical Root Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analytical Approach.International journal of dentistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of detecting vertical root fractures in Biodentine™-filled teeth using the Promax 3Dmax cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) unit compared to periapical radiographs. It tested hypotheses regarding CBCT's diagnostic superiority in non-root-filled and Biodentine™-root-filled maxillary central incisors and assessed the impact of smaller field of view and lower intensity settings on detection accuracy. MATERIALS AND
methodsExtracted maxillary incisors were divided into groups based on fracture status and root filling material, then placed in a Thiel-embalmed skull to simulate clinical conditions. The teeth were imaged using periapical radiographs and the CBCT unit under different settings. Fracture thickness was measured with microcomputed tomography for accuracy benchmarking. Multiple observers assessed the images, and statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate diagnostic performance.
resultsIntra-rater reliabilities of consensus scores ranged from good to very good. Specificities were generally higher than sensitivities across all imaging modalities, but sensitivities remained constantly low. None of the Area Under the Curve scores exceeded 0.6, indicating poor overall accuracy for all imaging modalities. Paired comparisons of the area differences under Receiver Operator Characteristic curves revealed no significant differences between the CBCT and periapical radiograph techniques for detecting vertical root fractures in either Biodentine™-filled or non-root-filled teeth.
conclusionsThere was no significant accuracy improvement of the current CBCT device (Promax 3Dmax, Planmeca, Finland) over periapical radiographs in detecting small vertical root fractures in both non-root-filled and Biodentine™-root-filled maxillary central incisors. A smaller field of view with lower intensity did not enhance detection accuracy. These results highlight the challenges in accurately detecting small VRFs, emphasizing the need for further research and technological advancements in this domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.