Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367333›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

MRI T2WI-based radiomics combined with KRAS gene mutation constructed models for predicting liver metastasis in rectal cancer.

Jiaqi Ma, Xinsheng Nie, Xiangjiang Kong, Lingqing Xiao, Han Liu, Shengming Shi, Yupeng Wu, Na Li, Linlin Hu, Xiaofu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Colorectal cancer liver metastases: A radiologic point of view.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jiaqi MaDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnostic, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Baojian Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, China.
Xinsheng NieMedical Imaging Center, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Tenth Division Beitun Hospital, Beitun, 836099, China.
Xiangjiang KongMedical Imaging Center, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Tenth Division Beitun Hospital, Beitun, 836099, China.
Lingqing XiaoMedical Imaging Center, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Tenth Division Beitun Hospital, Beitun, 836099, China.
Han LiuDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnostic, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Baojian Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, China.
Shengming ShiDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnostic, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Baojian Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, China.
Yupeng WuDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnostic, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Baojian Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, China.
Na LiMedical Imaging Center, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Tenth Division Beitun Hospital, Beitun, 836099, China.
Linlin HuMedical Imaging Center, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Tenth Division Beitun Hospital, Beitun, 836099, China.
Xiaofu LiDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnostic, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Baojian Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, China. drxiaofuli@hrbmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps 2021AB029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study aimed to identify the optimal model for predicting rectal cancer liver metastasis (RCLM). This involved constructing various prediction models to aid clinicians in early diagnosis and precise decision-making.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 193 patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma were randomly divided into training set (n = 136) and validation set (n = 57) at a ratio of 7:3. The predictive performance of three models was internally validated by 10-fold cross-validation in the training set. Delineation of the tumor region of interest (ROI) was performed, followed by the extraction of radiomics features from the ROI. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression algorithm and multivariate Cox analysis were employed to reduce the dimensionality of radiomics features and identify significant features. Logistic regression was employed to construct three prediction models: clinical, radiomics, and combined models (radiomics + clinical). The predictive performance of each model was assessed and compared.

resultsKRAS mutation emerged as an independent predictor of liver metastasis, yielding an odds ratio (OR) of 8.296 (95%CI: 3.471-19.830; p < 0.001). 5 radiomics features will be used to construct radiomics model. The combined model was built by integrating radiomics model with clinical model. In both the training set (AUC:0.842, 95%CI: 0.778-0.907) and the validation set (AUC: 0.805; 95%CI: 0.692-0.918), the AUCs for the combined model surpassed those of the radiomics and clinical models.

conclusionsOur study reveals that KRAS mutation stands as an independent predictor of RCLM. The radiomics features based on MR play a crucial role in the evaluation of RCLM. The combined model exhibits superior performance in the prediction of liver metastasis. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Liver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Rectal NeoplasmsAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)KRAS mutationMRIRadiomicsRCRCLM

Identifiers

PMID39367333
PMCPMC11453062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.