Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367329›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2024

La (NO

Tingting Jia, Junjun Gu, Miao Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tingting Jia *College of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, 832003, The People's Republic of China.
Junjun Gu *College of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, 832003, The People's Republic of China.
Miao MaCollege of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, 832003, The People's Republic of China. mamiaogg@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The taproot of Glycyrrhiza uralensis is globally appreciated for its medicinal and commercial value and is one of the most popular medicinal plants. With the decline of wild G. uralensis resources, cultivated G. uralensis has become a key method to ensure supply. However, soil salinization poses challenges to G. uralensis cultivation and affects the yield and quality of it. In this study, the inhibitory effects of NaCl and Na

Indexed as

Glycyrrhiza uralensisLanthanumNitratesSalt StressBiomassPhotosynthesisPlant RootsSalt ToleranceSodium ChlorideSulfatesLanthanumNitratesSodium ChlorideSulfatesAntioxidant system functionIonic balanceOsmoregulatory capacityPhotosynthetic performanceYield and quality

Identifiers

PMID39367329
PMCPMC11452937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.