ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
Wide exposure VS. stab surgical incisions in necrotizing fasciitis of the head and neck: a retrospective analysis of 22 cases.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNecrotizing fasciitis of the head and neck is a rare, rapidly progressing bacterial infection with high mortality. Traditional surgical management involves wide exposure incisions, but minimally invasive stab incisions have emerged as a potential alternative. This study aimed to compare outcomes between wide exposure and stab surgical incisions in the management of head and neck necrotizing fasciitis. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 22 patients treated for necrotizing fasciitis of the head and neck between January 2006 and January 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: wide exposure incisions (N = 15) and stab surgical incisions (N = 7). Data on mortality, hospital stay, hypertrophic scarring, neck contractures, and tracheostomy tube dependence were collected.
resultsThe overall mortality rate was 9.1%, with 6.7% in the wide exposure group and 14.3% in the stab surgical incision group (p > 0.05). Hypertrophic scarring occurred in 59.1% of patients, all of whom underwent wide exposure incisions. Neck contractures were observed in 9.1% of cases, also in the wide exposure group. Tracheostomy was performed in 63.6% of patients, with successful decannulation achieved in 91.7%. The median hospital stay was longer in the stab surgical incision group (p < 0.05), partly due to the need for revision surgeries.
conclusionWide exposure incisions remain the standard treatment for necrotizing fasciitis of the head and neck due to their effectiveness in managing extensive tissue necrosis. However, stab surgical incisions offer the advantage of reduced morbidity and functional impairment. These benefits are offset by a slightly higher mortality rate and the potential need for additional interventions. Stab incisions may be a viable option in carefully selected patients, particularly those without extensive comorbidities or advanced disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39367224What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.