ReviewFunctional & integrative genomics2024
KRAS mutations detection methodology: from RFLP to CRISPR/Cas based methods.
Review in Functional & integrative genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- KRAS signaling networks, mutational heterogeneity, and emerging therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Integrating single-cell and bulk RNA-Seq to unravel the molecular mechanisms of airway stenosis.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In personalized cancer medicine, the identification of KRAS mutations is essential for making treatment decisions and improving patient outcomes. This work presents a comprehensive review of the current approaches for detection of KRAS mutations in different cancers. We highlight the value of fast and reliable KRAS mutations discovery and the effectiveness of molecular testing for selecting individuals who might benefit from targeted therapy. We provide an overview of various methods and tools available for detecting KRAS mutations, such as digital droplet PCR, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We also address the difficulties and limitations in the identification of KRAS mutations, namely tumor heterogeneity and the emergence of resistance mechanisms. This article aims to guide clinicians in KRAS mutation identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39367162What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.