Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367153›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2024

Differential Hemodynamic Responses to Motor and Tactile Imagery: Insights from Multichannel fNIRS Mapping.

Andrei Miroshnikov, Lev Yakovlev, Nikolay Syrov, Anatoly Vasilyev, Artemiy Berkmush-Antipova, Frol Golovanov, Alexander Kaplan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrei MiroshnikovDepartment of Human and Animal Physiology, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory, 1, building 12, Moscow, 119234, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9497-2120
Lev YakovlevDepartment of Human and Animal Physiology, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory, 1, building 12, Moscow, 119234, Russia. leojackovlev@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6609-8176
Nikolay SyrovVladimir Zelman Center for Neurobiology and Brain Rehabilitation, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Bolshoy Boulevard, 30, building 1, Moscow, 121205, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8253-9426
Anatoly VasilyevDepartment of Human and Animal Physiology, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory, 1, building 12, Moscow, 119234, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1573-0730
Artemiy Berkmush-AntipovaBaltic Center for Neurotechnology and Artificial Intelligence, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Alexander Nevsky Street, 14, Kaliningrad, 236041, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9350-0845
Frol GolovanovBaltic Center for Neurotechnology and Artificial Intelligence, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Alexander Nevsky Street, 14, Kaliningrad, 236041, Russia.
Alexander KaplanDepartment of Human and Animal Physiology, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory, 1, building 12, Moscow, 119234, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3912-4639

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 21-75-30024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tactile and motor imagery are crucial components of sensorimotor functioning and cognitive neuroscience research, yet the neural mechanisms of tactile imagery remain underexplored compared to motor imagery. This study employs multichannel functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) combined with image reconstruction techniques to investigate the neural hemodynamics associated with tactile (TI) and motor imagery (MI). In a study of 15 healthy participants, we found that MI elicited significantly greater hemodynamic responses (HRs) in the precentral area compared to TI, suggesting the involvement of different cortical areas involved in two different types of sensorimotor mental imagery. Concurrently, the HRs in S1 and parietal areas exhibited comparable patterns in both TI and MI. During MI, both motor and somatosensory areas demonstrated comparable HRs. However, in TI, somatosensory activation was observed to be more pronounced. Our results highlight the distinctive neural profiles of motor versus tactile imagery and indicate fNIRS technique to be sensitive for this. This distinction is significant for fundamental understanding of sensorimotor integration and for developing advanced neurotechnologies, including imagery-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) that can differentiate between different types of mental imagery.

Indexed as

Brain MappingHemodynamicsImaginationSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredAdultBrainFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexSomatosensory CortexTouchTouch PerceptionYoung AdultCortical mappingFunctional near-infrared spectroscopyHemodynamic responseMotor imagerySensorimotor integrationTactile imagery

Identifiers

PMID39367153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.