ArticleNPJ precision oncology2024
The economic costs of precision medicine for clinical translational research among children with high-risk cancer.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor microenvironment-specific nanomedicine: from biology-driven to multi-omics-guided precision engineering.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Precision diagnosis and therapy for pediatric central nervous system tumors: consensus from the Brazilian Society of Pediatric Oncology (SOBOPE).Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
- EcoRxAgent: an AI agent for generating economically substitutable prescriptions.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Multiomics: the intersection of personalized nutrition in cardiometabolic diseases.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Comparative cost analysis of a diagnostic multi-omics platform for decision support in advanced cancer - results from the Tumor Profiler Melanoma project.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Multi-omics profiling and AI-driven clinically deployable risk models in MGUS and smoldering myeloma.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Immunomodulatory Natural Products in Cancer Organoid-Immune Co-Cultures: Bridging the Research Gap for Precision Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Challenges in Implementing Comprehensive Precision Medicine Screening for Ovarian Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Behavioral Medicine in Cholangiocarcinoma: Bridging the Gap Between Biology and Behavior.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Embedding precision medicine in paediatric oncology shows promise to have a positive impact on how children with cancer will be treated in the future. While there are a number of studies of precision medicine in childhood cancer, there is limited evidence available on the cost of implementing the related testing. This is the first Australian study that systematically measures the cost of using precision medicine in the care of high-risk childhood cancers, through the Zero Childhood Cancer Precision Medicine Programme. In 2021 Australian dollars, the estimated costs inclusive of genomic and preclinical testing were: (A) $12,743 per patient for access; (B) $14,262 per identification of molecular cause; and (C) $21,769 per MTB recommendation. The information gained supports the understanding of the cost of reporting clinically significant outcomes relevant to the biology of the tumour, diagnosis, prognosis and potentially improving clinical management for a child.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.