Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367080›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Prediction of emergency department presentations for acute coronary syndrome using a machine learning approach.

Vincent C Kurucz, Jimmy Schenk, Denise P Veelo, Bart F Geerts, Alexander P J Vlaar, Björn J P Van Der Ster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vincent C KuruczDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands. V.C.Kurucz@Amsterdamumc.nl.
Jimmy SchenkDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Denise P VeeloDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Bart F GeertsHealthplus.ai B.V, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexander P J VlaarDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Björn J P Van Der SterDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between weather and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) incidence has been the subject of considerable research, with varying conclusions. Harnessing machine learning techniques, our study explores the relationship between meteorological factors and ACS presentations in the emergency department (ED), offering insights into seasonal variations and inter-day fluctuations to optimize patient care and resource allocation. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted, encompassing ACS presentations to Dutch EDs from 2010 to 2017. Temporal patterns were analyzed using heat-maps and time series plots. Multivariable linear regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF) regression models were employed to forecast daily ACS presentations with prediction horizons of one, three, seven, and thirty days. Model performance was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R²), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). The study included 214,953 ACS presentations, predominantly unstable angina (UA) (94,272; 44%), non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (78,963; 37%), and ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) (41,718; 19%). A decline in daily ACS admissions over time was observed, with notable inter-day (estimated median difference: 41 (95%CI = 37-43, p = < 0.001) and seasonal variations (estimated median difference: 9 (95%CI 6-12, p = < 0.001). Both MLR and RF models demonstrated similar predictive capabilities, with MLR slightly outperforming RF. The models showed moderate explanatory power for ACS incidence (adjusted R² = 0.66; MAE (MAPE): 7.8 (11%)), with varying performance across subdiagnoses. Prediction of UA incidence resulted in the best-explained variability (adjusted R² = 0.80; MAE (MAPE): 5.3 (19.1%)), followed by NSTEMI and STEMI diagnoses. All models maintained consistent performance over extended prediction horizons. Our findings indicate that ACS presentation exhibits distinctive seasonal changes and inter-day differences, with marked reductions in incidence during the summer months and a distinct peak prevalence on Mondays. The predictive performance of our model was moderate. Nonetheless, we obtained good explanatory power for UA presentations. Our model emerges as a potentially valuable supplementary tool to enhance ED resource allocation or future predictive models predicting ACS incidence in the ED.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeEmergency Service, HospitalMachine LearningAgedAngina, UnstableFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionRetrospective StudiesSeasonsST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionWeather

Identifiers

PMID39367080
PMCPMC11452569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.