Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39366967›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2024

Cancer risk assessment of premalignant breast tissues from patients with BRCA mutations by genome profiling.

Takeshi Hirose, Masachika Ikegami, Kumiko Kida, Toshihide Ueno, Rina Kitada, Lei Wang, Shinya Tanaka, Makoto Endo, Yasuharu Nakashima, Naoki Kanomata and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Clinicopathological and molecular features of HRChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Takeshi HiroseDivision of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1588-9757
Masachika IkegamiDivision of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0491-7142
Kumiko KidaDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.
Toshihide UenoDivision of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7408-7298
Rina KitadaDivision of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Lei WangDepartment of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Shinya TanakaDepartment of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Makoto EndoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Yasuharu NakashimaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Naoki KanomataDepartment of Pathology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki ManoDivision of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Hideko YamauchiDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1450-7211
Shinji KohsakaDivision of Cellular Signaling, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. skohsaka@ncc.go.jp.

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) JP22kk0305018Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) JP22zf0127009MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 21K12117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with germline pathogenic variants of BRCA1/2 genes have a particular predisposition to develop breast cancer. No clinical test has been developed to accurately and quantitatively evaluate their risk of developing breast cancer. We hypothesized that aberrant cell clonal expansion may be initiated in normal breast tissues without manifesting pathologic changes. To assess the prevalence of clonal expansion in the normal breast, we collected normal breast tissue from 24 breast cancer patients who had undergone surgical resection and 5 carriers of pathogenic BRCA1/2 variant who had undergone prophylactic mastectomy. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was conducted in 97 specimens from 14 individuals, and TOP panel, a gene panel targeting 464 genes, was conducted in 321 specimens from 26 individuals, including 8 individuals with germline pathogenic variants of BRCA1/2 genes. Recurrent oncogenic mutations within PIK3CA, ARHGAP35, HRAS, and NF1 were identified in normal breast tissue at considerable variant allelic frequencies (VAF), suggesting clonal expansion. In addition, 937 normal breast tissues were evaluated using the Breast Cancer Panel (BCP) targeting 25 genes to determine the exact prevalence and distribution of clonal expansion. To assess the clonal expansion, we developed the clonality score, which is the mean value of clonal cell fractions for samples obtained from a given breast. The average clonality score in macroscopically normal breast tissue was 0.95 (0-2.46), with a significant difference between cases with and without a history of breast cancer of stage 2 or more advanced stage (p = 0.01). Additional WES on 42 samples with relatively large clone size (VAF > 3%) confirmed that these cell clones harbored multiple mutations (10.7 mutations/sample), and the number of existing mutations was consistent with the clone size (R = 0.50). The results suggest that clonal changes occur in normal breast tissue of women at high risk for breast cancer even before cancer is detected pathologically and/or radiologically, and the clonality score shows the potential to be a valid method of evaluating clonal expansion for cancer-risk assessment that provides appropriate preventive options for patients at high risk for breast cancer.

Identifiers

PMID39366967
PMCPMC11452615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.