ArticleNPJ breast cancer2024
Cancer risk assessment of premalignant breast tissues from patients with BRCA mutations by genome profiling.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk Assessment and Fertility Counseling for Hereditary Gynecological Cancer Syndromes.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Clinicopathological and molecular features of HRChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with germline pathogenic variants of BRCA1/2 genes have a particular predisposition to develop breast cancer. No clinical test has been developed to accurately and quantitatively evaluate their risk of developing breast cancer. We hypothesized that aberrant cell clonal expansion may be initiated in normal breast tissues without manifesting pathologic changes. To assess the prevalence of clonal expansion in the normal breast, we collected normal breast tissue from 24 breast cancer patients who had undergone surgical resection and 5 carriers of pathogenic BRCA1/2 variant who had undergone prophylactic mastectomy. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was conducted in 97 specimens from 14 individuals, and TOP panel, a gene panel targeting 464 genes, was conducted in 321 specimens from 26 individuals, including 8 individuals with germline pathogenic variants of BRCA1/2 genes. Recurrent oncogenic mutations within PIK3CA, ARHGAP35, HRAS, and NF1 were identified in normal breast tissue at considerable variant allelic frequencies (VAF), suggesting clonal expansion. In addition, 937 normal breast tissues were evaluated using the Breast Cancer Panel (BCP) targeting 25 genes to determine the exact prevalence and distribution of clonal expansion. To assess the clonal expansion, we developed the clonality score, which is the mean value of clonal cell fractions for samples obtained from a given breast. The average clonality score in macroscopically normal breast tissue was 0.95 (0-2.46), with a significant difference between cases with and without a history of breast cancer of stage 2 or more advanced stage (p = 0.01). Additional WES on 42 samples with relatively large clone size (VAF > 3%) confirmed that these cell clones harbored multiple mutations (10.7 mutations/sample), and the number of existing mutations was consistent with the clone size (R = 0.50). The results suggest that clonal changes occur in normal breast tissue of women at high risk for breast cancer even before cancer is detected pathologically and/or radiologically, and the clonality score shows the potential to be a valid method of evaluating clonal expansion for cancer-risk assessment that provides appropriate preventive options for patients at high risk for breast cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.