Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39366915›Full record

ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2024

Artificial Intelligence Smartphone Application for Detection of Simulated Skin Changes: An In Vivo Pilot Study.

Gabriela Lladó Grove, Gorm Reedtz, Brian Vangsgaard, Hassan Eskandarani, Merete Haedersdal, Flemming Andersen, Peter Bjerring

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gabriela Lladó GroveDepartment of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6954-4458
Gorm ReedtzDepartment of Dermatology, Private Hospital Molholm, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3851-8149
Brian VangsgaardSkinChange.AI Aps, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5768-3803
Hassan EskandaraniDepartment of Dermatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4076-1882
Merete HaedersdalDepartment of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1250-2035
Flemming AndersenDepartment of Dermatology, Private Hospital Molholm, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1199-9396
Peter BjerringDepartment of Dermatology, Private Hospital Molholm, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3031-1390

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly expanding, showing promise in the dermatological field. Skin checks are a resource-heavy challenge that could potentially benefit from AI-tool assistance, particularly if provided in widely available AI solutions. A novel smartphone application(app)-based AI system, "SCAI," was developed and trained to recognize spots in paired images of skin, pursuing identification of new skin lesions. This pilot study aimed to investigate the feasibility of the SCAI-app to identify simulated skin changes in vivo. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study was conducted in a controlled setting with healthy volunteers and standardized, simulated skin changes (test spots), consisting of customized 3-mm adhesive spots in three colors (black, brown, and red). Each volunteer had a total of eight test spots adhered to four areas on back and legs. The SCAI-app collected smartphone- and template-guided standardized images before and after test spot application, using its backend AI algorithms to identify changes between the paired images.

resultsTwenty-four volunteers were included, amounting to a total of 192 test spots. Overall, the detection algorithms identified test spots with a sensitivity of 92.0% (CI: 88.1-95.9) and a specificity of 95.5% (CI: 95.0-96.0). The SCAI-app's positive predictive value was 38.0% (CI: 31.0-44.9), while the negative predictive value was 99.7% (CI: 99.0-100).

conclusionThis pilot study showed that SCAI-app could detect simulated skin changes in a controlled in vivo setting. The app's feasibility in a clinical setting with real-life skin lesions remains to be investigated, where the challenge with false positives in particular needs to be addressed.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMobile ApplicationsSkinSmartphoneAdultAlgorithmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSensitivity and SpecificitySkin DiseasesYoung AdultAIartificial intelligencedetectionfeasibility studypilot studyskin changesmartphone

Identifiers

PMID39366915
PMCPMC11452258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.