ReviewHematology, transfusion and cell therapy2024
Venetoclax with low-dose cytarabine, a forgotten combination in patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: a systematic review.
Review in Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBased on the VIALE-A and VIALE-C studies, the Food and Drug Administration approved venetoclax in 2020 in combination with azacitidine or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. After the publication of these studies, venetoclax/azacitidine was assumed to be superior to venetoclax/low-dose cytarabine; however, these studies were not designed to demonstrate superiority between these combinations. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to describe overall survival, complete remission rate, and composite complete remission rate to assess response of these two regimens in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for retrospective studies and complete remission, composite complete remission, and overall survival rates were recorded.
resultsOnly 11 of the 815 publications identified were eligible to be included n this review, ten studies evaluated the venetoclax/azacitidine combination and one study evaluated the venetoclax/low-dose cytarabine combination. The median overall survival for venetoclax/azacitidine was 10.75 months, whereas for venetoclax/low-dose cytarabine the median overall survival had not been reached at the time of publication. Composite complete remission was 63.3 % for venetoclax/azacitidine and 90 % for venetoclax/low-dose cytarabine. Adverse events were similar for both combinations.
conclusionsA limited number of studies investigating the venetoclax/low-dose cytarabine combination exist. Based on the available data, the superiority of venetoclax/azacitidine over venetoclax/low-dose cytarabine cannot be assumed for all acute myeloid leukemia patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Venetoclax/low-dose cytarabine can still be considered as an option for the drug combinations currently under investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.