ArticleHematology, transfusion and cell therapy2024
Benefits of BV-AVD (Brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) versus ABVD (doxorubicin hydrochloride, bleomycin sulfate, vinblastine sulfate, dacarbazine) in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: an analysis of the ECHELON 1 trial by the GATLA group using the Delphi Method.
Article in Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging therapeutic strategies for CD30-positive lymphomas.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Pharmacological potential of bioactive compounds inToxicology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe BV-AVD (Brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) combination for first-line treatment of advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma has been approved by regulatory authorities and included in international guidelines. However, several factors influence its incorporation as standard of care. MATERIALS AND
methodsA group of experts from different institutions was identified and, using the Delphi method, an analysis of the results of the ECHELON 1 trial for the indication of BV-AVD over ABVD (doxorubicin hydrochloride, bleomycin sulfate, vinblastine sulfate, dacarbazine) in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma Stages III and IV in Argentina was done. The clinical and academic experience of the authors and the context of the Argentine healthcare system were considered. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Seven statements on general aspects of the management of Hodgkin's lymphoma and nine on specific aspects related to the use of BV-AVD over ABVD reached a consensus of agreement. There was a strong expert consensus in favor of indicating BV-AVD in the presence of extranodal disease or pulmonary disease. Moderate to severe neuropathy, pregnancy and drug allergy were considered absolute contraindications to prescribe BV.
conclusionsThe authors agreed that BV-AVD could be considered a new treatment option in high-risk patients. However health system-dependent factors (such as high cost, lack of availability, reimbursement difficulties, irregular delivery, and issues with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor availability) could pose limitations for this prescription. While awaiting new data from clinical trials and real-world studies, these recommendations can represent a useful tool for hematologists in different parts of the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.