ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2024
Biodiversity of microorganisms in the Baltic Sea: the power of novel methods in the identification of marine microbes.
Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA-based monitoring uncovers contrasting salinity-driven diversity patterns of bacterial and protist plankton in the Baltic Sea area.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Life in sediments fosters 'sexual' speciation in the Shewanella baltica complex.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Seasonal Shifts in the Microbiota of Wild-Caught DanishMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Screening of 44 Baltic Sea Cyanobacterial Strains for Antibacterial and Quorum Sensing Inhibitory Potential: Selection of Promising Candidates.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Diatoms (Bacillariophyta) of the Salish Sea, Northeast Pacific: annotated checklist and new species reports.Biodiversity data journal · 2026Article
- Intestinal Microbial Profiles of Wild Zobaidy (Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Temporal-Spatial Variations in Microbial Diversity and Community Composition in Surface Waters and Bottom Sediments of the Bohai Sea, China.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Low impact of Zostera marina meadows on sediment and water microbiota under brackish conditions.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- Unlocking the biotechnological potential of Baltic microorganisms.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Until recently, the data on the diversity of the entire microbial community from the Baltic Sea were relatively rare and very scarce. However, modern molecular methods have provided new insights into this field with interesting results. They can be summarized as follows. (i) Although low salinity causes a reduction in the biodiversity of multicellular species relative to the populations of the North-East Atlantic, no such reduction occurs in bacterial diversity. (ii) Among cyanobacteria, the picocyanobacterial group dominates when considering gene abundance, while filamentous cyanobacteria dominate in means of biomass. (iii) The diversity of diatoms and dinoflagellates is significantly larger than described a few decades ago; however, molecular studies on these groups are still scarce. (iv) Knowledge gaps in other protistan communities are evident. (v) Salinity is the main limiting parameter of pelagic fungal community composition, while the benthic fungal diversity is shaped by water depth, salinity, and sediment C and N availability. (vi) Bacteriophages are the predominant group of viruses, while among viruses infecting eukaryotic hosts, Phycodnaviridae are the most abundant; the Baltic Sea virome is contaminated with viruses originating from urban and/or industrial habitats. These features make the Baltic Sea microbiome specific and unique among other marine environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.