ArticleBMJ open2024
Satisfaction survey on graduates of standardised training for resident doctors in Guizhou Province, China.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Mind Mapping with Virtual Simulation: A Cognitive Scaffolding for Clinical Reasoning in Residency.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Study on strategies to improve clinical fellow training satisfaction based on importance-performance analysis (IPA).BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Application of BOPPPS and Flipped Classroom Joint Teaching Model into Clinical Practice Ability of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents in Standardized Training.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the satisfaction levels of graduate residents in Guizhou Province and analyse the factors influencing their satisfaction.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted using a simple random sampling method with all graduate residents from 24 hospitals in Guizhou Province. The survey covered the residents' demographic information, information about the training hospitals and satisfaction survey responses. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 29.0, including descriptive statistics using component ratios, binomial distribution tests for specific satisfaction situations,
resultsThe survey included 1070 graduate residents of Guizhou Province, China, including 500 males (46.7%) and 570 females (53.3%). The satisfaction questionnaire revealed that 23.8% were very satisfied; 45.4% were somewhat satisfied; and 26.4%, 2.3% and 2.1% were average, somewhat dissatisfied and very dissatisfied, respectively. Factors influencing residency satisfaction included gender, age, training base level, identity type, training participation year and average monthly income.
conclusionBased on this study, the satisfaction of graduate residents in Guizhou Province, China, is relatively lower than that in other countries and provinces. Therefore, Guizhou Province should take appropriate measures to address these influencing factors and enhance residency training satisfaction, thereby improving the residency training quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.