Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39366361›Full record

ReviewCell stem cell2024

Early human development and stem cell-based human embryo models.

Marta N Shahbazi, Vincent Pasque

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell stem cell, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The making of cells and organs in xenogeneic animal bioreactor.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The human placenta development and anatomy.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Challenges of studying signaling metabolites in early development.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Mechanisms of human germ cell development.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  20. Modeling Post-Implantation Mammalian Embryogenesis Using AdvancedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marta N ShahbaziMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK. Electronic address: mshahbazi@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.
Vincent PasqueDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Leuven Stem Cell Institute & Leuven Institute for Single-Cell Omics (LISCO), Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: vincent.pasque@kuleuven.be.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_1201/24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of stem cells to model the early human embryo promises to transform our understanding of developmental biology and human reproduction. In this review, we present our current knowledge of the first 2 weeks of human embryo development. We first focus on the distinct cell lineages of the embryo and the derivation of stem cell lines. We then discuss the intercellular crosstalk that guides early embryo development and how this crosstalk is recapitulated in vitro to generate stem cell-based embryo models. We highlight advances in this fast-developing field, discuss current limitations, and provide a vision for the future.

Indexed as

Embryonic DevelopmentAnimalsCell LineageEmbryo, MammalianHumansModels, BiologicalStem Cellshuman embryospluripotent stem cellsstem cell-based embryo models

Identifiers

PMID39366361
PMCPMC7617107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.