Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39366294›Full record

ReviewESMO open2024

Evolving therapeutic landscape of advanced biliary tract cancer: from chemotherapy to molecular targets.

L Kehmann, M Jördens, S H Loosen, T Luedde, C Roderburg, C Leyh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Next Generation Sequencing for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Biliary Strictures.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Novel Biopsy Gun Impacts Biopsy Sample Quality and Quantity.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L KehmannDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Servier Deutschland GmbH, München, Germany.
M JördensClinic of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Düsseldorf, Germany.
S H LoosenClinic of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Düsseldorf, Germany.
T LueddeClinic of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Düsseldorf, Germany.
C RoderburgClinic of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Düsseldorf, Germany.
C LeyhClinic of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Düsseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: catherine.leyh@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biliary tract cancer, the second most common type of liver cancer, remains a therapeutic challenge due to its late diagnosis and poor prognosis. In recent years, it has become evident that classical chemotherapy might not be the optimal treatment for patients with biliary tract cancer, especially after failure of first-line therapy. Finding new treatment options and strategies to improve the survival of these patients is therefore crucial. With the rise and increasing availability of genetic testing in patients with tumor, novel treatment approaches targeting specific genetic alterations have recently been proposed and have demonstrated their safety and efficacy in numerous clinical trials. In this review, we will first consider chemotherapy options and the new possibility of combining chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in first-line treatment. We will then provide an overview of genomic alterations and their potential for targeted therapy especially in second-line therapy. In addition to the most common alterations such as isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH1/2) mutations, fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusions, and alterations, we will also discuss less frequently encountered alterations such as BRAF V600E mutation and neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor gene (NTRK) fusion. We highlight the importance of molecular profiling in guiding therapeutic decisions and emphasize the need for continued research to optimize and expand targeted treatment strategies for this aggressive malignancy.

Indexed as

Biliary Tract NeoplasmsMolecular Targeted TherapyAntineoplastic AgentsHumansAntineoplastic Agentsbiliary tract cancerFGFR2IDH1precision oncologytargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID39366294
PMCPMC11489061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.