Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39365767›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Identifying individuals at high risk for dementia in primary care: Development and validation of the DemRisk risk prediction model using routinely collected patient data.

David Reeves, Catharine Morgan, Daniel Stamate, Elizabeth Ford, Darren M Ashcroft, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Harm Van Marwijk, Brian McMillan

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David ReevesDivision of Population Health, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6377-6859
Catharine MorganDivision of Population Health, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Daniel StamateDivision of Population Health, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth FordDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5613-8509
Darren M AshcroftDivision of Population Health, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2958-915X
Evangelos KontopantelisDivision of Population Health, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6450-5815
Harm Van MarwijkDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Brian McMillanDivision of Population Health, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0683-3877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth policy in the UK and globally regarding dementia, emphasises prevention and risk reduction. These goals could be facilitated by automated assessment of dementia risk in primary care using routinely collected patient data. However, existing applicable tools are weak at identifying patients at high risk for dementia. We set out to develop improved risk prediction models deployable in primary care.

methodsElectronic health records (EHRs) for patients aged 60-89 from 393 English general practices were extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD database. 235 and 158 practices respectively were randomly assigned to development and validation cohorts. Separate dementia risk models were developed for patients aged 60-79 (development cohort n = 616,366; validation cohort n = 419,126) and 80-89 (n = 175,131 and n = 118,717). The outcome was incident dementia within 5 years and more than 60 evidence-based risk factors were evaluated. Risk models were developed and validated using multivariable Cox regression.

resultsThe age 60-79 development cohort included 10,841 incident cases of dementia (6.3 per 1,000 person-years) and the age 80-89 development cohort included 15,994 (40.2 per 1,000 person-years). Discrimination and calibration for the resulting age 60-79 model were good (Harrell's C 0.78 (95% CI: 0.78 to 0.79); Royston's D 1.74 (1.70 to 1.78); calibration slope 0.98 (0.96 to 1.01)), with 37% of patients in the top 1% of risk scores receiving a dementia diagnosis within 5 years. Fit statistics were lower for the age 80-89 model but dementia incidence was higher and 79% of those in the top 1% of risk scores subsequently developed dementia.

conclusionOur models can identify individuals at higher risk of dementia using routinely collected information from their primary care record, and outperform an existing EHR-based tool. Discriminative ability was greatest for those aged 60-79, but the model for those aged 80-89 may also be clinical useful.

Indexed as

DementiaElectronic Health RecordsPrimary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID39365767
PMCPMC11452046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.