Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39365764›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

A novel mean shape based post-processing method for enhancing deep learning lower-limb muscle segmentation accuracy.

Zhicheng Lin, Enrico Dall'Ara, Lingzhong Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhicheng LinDepartment of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0004-9577-2413
Enrico Dall'AraDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Lingzhong GuoDepartment of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3832-1227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims at improving the lower-limb muscle segmentation accuracy of deep learning approaches based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, crucial for the diagnostic and therapeutic processes in musculoskeletal diseases. In general, segmentation methods such as U-Net deep learning neural networks can achieve good Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) values, e.g. around 0.83 to 0.91 on various cohorts. Some generic post-processing strategies have been studied to incorporate connectivity constraints into the resulting masks for the purpose of further improving the segmentation accuracy. In this paper, a novel mean shape (MS) based post-processing method is proposed, utilizing Statistical Shape Modelling (SSM) to fine-tune the segmentation output, taking into consideration the muscle anatomical shape. The methodology was compared to existing post-processing techniques and a commercial semi-automatic tool on MRI scans from two cohorts of post-menopausal women (10 Training, 8 Testing, voxel size 1.0x1.0x1.0 mm3). The MS based method obtained a mean DSC of 0.83 across the different analysed muscles and the best performance for the Hausdorff Distance (HD, 20.6 mm) and the Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD, 2.1 mm). These findings highlight the feasibility and potential of using anatomical mean shape in post-processing of human lower-limb muscle segmentation task and indicate that the proposed method can be popularized to other biological organ segmentation mission.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMuscle, SkeletalFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLower ExtremityMiddle AgedNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID39365764
PMCPMC11452003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.