ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Evaluation of cumulative dose distributions from external beam radiation therapy using CT-to-CBCT deformable image registration (DIR) for cervical cancer patients.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-Center Preliminary Experience Treating Endometrial Cancer Patients with Fiducial Markers.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of cumulative dose distributions from external beam radiation therapy using CT-to-CBCT deformable image registration (DIR) for cervical cancer patients.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate dose differences between the planning CT (pCT) and dose calculated on pre-treatment verification CBCTs using DIR and dose summation for cervical cancer patients.
methodsCervical cancer patients treated at our institution with 45 Gy EBRT undergo a pCT and 5 CBCTs, once every five fractions of treatment. A free-form intensity-based DIR in MIM was performed between the pCT and each CBCT using the "Merged CBCT" feature to generate an extended FOV-CBCT (mCBCT). DIR-generated bladder and rectum contours were adjusted by a physician, and dice similarity coefficients (DSC) were calculated. After deformation, the investigated doses were (1) recalculated in Eclipse using original plan parameters (ecD), and (2) deformed from planning dose (pD) using the deformation matrix in MIM (mdD). Dose summation was performed to the first week's mCBCT. Dose distributions were compared for the bladder, rectum, and PTV in terms of percent dose difference, dose volume histograms (DVHs), and gamma analysis between the calculated doses.
resultsFor the 20 patients, the mean DSC was 0.68 ± 0.17 for bladder and 0.79 ± 0.09 for rectum. Most patients were within 5% of pD for D2cc (19/20), Dmax (17/20), and Dmean (16/20). All patients demonstrated a percent difference > 5% for bladder V45 due to variations in bladder volume from the pCT. D90 showed fewer differences with 19/20 patients within 2% of pD. Gamma rates between pD and ecD averaged 94% for bladder and 94% for rectum, while pD and mdD exhibited slightly better performance for bladder (93%) and lower for rectum (85%).
conclusionUsing DIR with weekly CBCT images, the MIM deformed dose (mdD) was found to be in close agreement with the Eclipse calculated dose (ecD). The proposed workflow should be used on a case-by-case basis when the weekly CBCT shows marked difference in organs-at-risk from the planning CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.