Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39365730›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

A chromatic feature detector in the retina signals visual context changes.

Larissa Höfling, Klaudia P Szatko, Christian Behrens, Yuyao Deng, Yongrong Qiu, David Alexander Klindt, Zachary Jessen, Gregory W Schwartz, Matthias Bethge, Philipp Berens and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inhibition benefits neural system identification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Different retinal microvascular response to flicker light between normal-tension glaucoma and high-tension primary open-angle glaucoma detected with optical coherence tomography angiography.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Larissa HöflingInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2459-0706
Klaudia P SzatkoInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Christian BehrensInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3623-352X
Yuyao DengInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Yongrong QiuInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
David Alexander KlindtSLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Menlo Park, United States.
Zachary JessenFeinberg School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States.
Gregory W SchwartzFeinberg School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8909-4397
Matthias BethgeCentre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6417-7812
Philipp BerensInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0199-4727
Katrin FrankeInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8649-4835
Alexander S EckerInstitute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-5105
Thomas EulerInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4567-6966

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008152 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ARDEHALI, HOSSEIN · 1987 to 2021
$24.0M
Functional consequences of heterotypic retinal ganglion cell couplingR01EY031329 · NEI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SCHWARTZ, GREGORY WILLIAM · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
Synapses as Independent Computational Units in the Excitatory Pathways of the RetinaR01EY031029 · NEI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SCHWARTZ, GREGORY WILLIAM · 2020 to 2023
$1.6M
Mechanisms of neurovascular coupling in the retina and their dysfunction in diabetesF30EY031565 · NEI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI JESSEN, ZACHARY · 2020 to 2023
$193k
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung FKZ 01IS18039ADeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CRC 1233 project number 276693517Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CRC 1456 project number 432680300Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC 2064 390727645Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Heisenberg Professorship BE5601/8-1European Research Council grant agreement No. 101041669NEI NIH HHS F30 EY031565NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031029NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031329NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008152NIH HHS NEI EY031029NIH HHS NEI EY031329NIH HHS NEI F30EY031565NIH HHS NIGMS T32GM008152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The retina transforms patterns of light into visual feature representations supporting behaviour. These representations are distributed across various types of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), whose spatial and temporal tuning properties have been studied extensively in many model organisms, including the mouse. However, it has been difficult to link the potentially nonlinear retinal transformations of natural visual inputs to specific ethological purposes. Here, we discover a nonlinear selectivity to chromatic contrast in an RGC type that allows the detection of changes in visual context. We trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) model on large-scale functional recordings of RGC responses to natural mouse movies, and then used this model to search in silico for stimuli that maximally excite distinct types of RGCs. This procedure predicted centre colour opponency in transient suppressed-by-contrast (tSbC) RGCs, a cell type whose function is being debated. We confirmed experimentally that these cells indeed responded very selectively to Green-OFF, UV-ON contrasts. This type of chromatic contrast was characteristic of transitions from ground to sky in the visual scene, as might be elicited by head or eye movements across the horizon. Because tSbC cells performed best among all RGC types at reliably detecting these transitions, we suggest a role for this RGC type in providing contextual information (i.e. sky or ground) necessary for the selection of appropriate behavioural responses to other stimuli, such as looming objects. Our work showcases how a combination of experiments with natural stimuli and computational modelling allows discovering novel types of stimulus selectivity and identifying their potential ethological relevance.

Indexed as

Retinal Ganglion CellsAnimalsColor PerceptionMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeural Networks, ComputerPhotic StimulationRetina2P imagingcomputational modellingconvolutional neural networksmousenatural stimulineuroscienceretinavisual ecology

Identifiers

PMID39365730
PMCPMC11452179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.