ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2025
Predictors of encapsulated peritoneal sclerosis in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis using neutral-pH dialysate.
Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Host-Pathogen Crosstalk in Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis: Molecular Mechanisms Driving Peritoneal Membrane Remodeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The epidemiology of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in an era of biocompatible neutral peritoneal dialysis solution in Japan.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEncapsulated peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a serious complication in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). Neutral-pH dialysate is associated with less peritoneal damage and a lower incidence of EPS than conventional PD solution. However, monitoring for peritoneal damage and predicting EPS remain important during PD therapy.
methodsWe measured the mesothelial cell area, dialysate-to-plasma ratio of creatinine after 4 h, and concentrations of the potential biological markers effluent fibrin degradation products (eFDPs), cancer antigen-125, and interleukin-6 in the effluent dialysate from patients who had been undergoing PD therapy for > 5 years in our hospital. These biomarkers were obtained from the drainage fluid of the final measurement of peritoneal equilibration testing before withdrawal from PD therapy. The concentrations of these potential biomarkers were measured in 39 patients who withdrew from PD therapy and were enrolled in the study.
resultsThree participants developed EPS after withdrawing PD. The dialysate-to-plasma ratio of creatinine, area of mesothelial cells, and interleukin-6 appearance rate in participants who developed EPS tended to be higher than those in patients who did not, but there were no significant differences. Significantly more eFDPs were in participants who developed EPS than in those who did not (138.5 ± 15.1 vs. 32.9 ± 7.4 µg/mL, P = 0.002). There was no difference in the cancer antigen-125 appearance rate between the groups. A cut-off value of eFDPs ≥ 119.1 µg/mL was optimal for predicting EPS (P = 0.006, specificity = 0.972, sensitivity = 1.000).
conclusionThis study shows that eFDPs may be a useful biological marker for predicting EPS in patients undergoing PD using neutral-pH dialysate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39365525What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.