ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2024
Emphasizing the need for preconceptional, prenatal genetic counseling and comprehensive genetic testing in consanguinity: challenges and experience.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Negotiating genetic risk in Indonesia: Development and psychometric evaluation of the knowledge and attitude toward consanguineous marriage instrument in a mixed-methods cross-sectional study.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Public healthcare system preparedness and community perceptions on comprehensive preconception care service delivery in Maharashtra, India.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Integration of medical genetics and genomics into faculty development programs in india: assessment of success and experience of genetic research centre.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- GenTIGS: a database empowering research and clinical insights on rare genetic disorders with an Indian perspective.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preconception and prenatal genetic counseling is a well-established means of risk assessment in many parts of the world, and in recent years, an emerging concept in India. Likelihood of an offspring having autosomal recessive disorder increases based on the degree of consanguinity. Hence, genetic testing of the couple for the identification of carrier status for disease-causing variants is crucial. The purpose of this study is to understand the frequency of genetic abnormalities in consanguineous marriages by using a comprehensive genetic testing algorithm where in karyotyping, FISH, exome sequencing and microarray are used sequentially to determine the genetic etiology based on the clinical presentation and to evaluate the need and benefits of preconceptional and prenatal genetic counseling. This retrospective study includes 66 couples having consanguinity referred for genetic counseling and testing. Of the 66 couples, 58 underwent comprehensive genetic testing which included Karyotyping, Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH), Microarray and Exome sequencing based on their clinical presentation. The analyses revealed a genetic abnormality in approximately 31% and chromosomal polymorphic variations & variants of uncertain significance in 17% of the couples. Counseling in these couples helped in identifying the carrier status and enabled them to take an informed decision in subsequent pregnancies. These findings reiterate the acute need for preconception and prenatal genetic counseling services in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39365491What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.