ArticleArchives of virology2024
Comparative study of the propagation and plaque titration conditions for human coronavirus OC43 as a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2.
Article in Archives of virology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is threatening human health globally. The development of effective drugs and vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 is hindered by the limited access to high-biosafety-level facilities. Although human coronavirus (HCoV) OC43, a low-pathogenic endemic human coronavirus, has been used as a surrogate virus for SARS-CoV-2 research, a standard technique for HCoV-OC43 culture and plaque titration has not been established. Our objective was to establish optimized culture and titration protocols for HCoV-OC43. The growth kinetics and permissibility to HCoV-OC43 infection of seven different cell lines were examined concurrently at two different temperatures, 33°C and 37°C. Cell lines exhibiting a cytopathic effect (CPE) were selected for plaque titration. No significant difference in the rate of cell growth was observed at the two temperatures tested. Interestingly, HCoV-OC43 was found not to be a high-temperature-sensitive virus, since it grew well at 37°C. Although RD, LLC-MK2, MRC-5, and HCT-8 cell lines supported virus growth with an obvious cytopathic effect and a high yield of virus after two days of infection, only RD cells were suitable for producing countable plaques. The incubation of the cells with 1.2% low-viscosity Avicel as an overlay medium at 37°C for 4 days appeared to promote clearer and sharper plaque morphology. However, further optimization of the plaque titration protocol is still required due to the continued observation of plaque size variation and hazy zones. We propose a cost-effective protocol for HCoV-OC43 culture and plaque titration that can be implemented at a standard conventional temperature without the need for additional special equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39365483What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.