ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Development of a disulfidptosis-related prognostic model for endometrial cancer with potential therapeutic target.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic risk modeling of endometrial cancer using programmed cell death-related genes: a comprehensive machine learning approach.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Research progress and potential therapeutic targets of a novel disulfide stress-driven cell death-disulfidptosis in gynecological tumors and other gynecological disorders.American journal of cancer research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prognosis biomarkers for endometrial cancer (EC) are in need. Recent evidence demonstrated the critical role of disulfidptosis, a novel cell death modality, in cancer. However, limited studies have developed a disulfidptosis-related gene model for EC. Disulfidptosis prognosis score of EC (disulfidptosis-PSEC) were constructed using disulfidptosis-related differently expression genes with the RNA data of 544 EC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. Model was evaluated using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), along with the hazard ratio (HR) between risk groups. Then, the cellular and molecular profile for different risk groups were performed, along with drug target inference. Disulfidptosis-PSEC demonstrated outstanding prognostic value for OS and DFS, with 5-year area under curve of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58-0.75) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.62-0.76), respectively. Low risk group demonstrated better survival with an HR of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.24-0.59) and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.32-0.66) for OS and DFS, respectively. The model was independent of TCGA subtype. Low risk group were featured with more immune cell infiltration and less gene mutation. Serval drug targets, and the therapeutic value of serotonin receptor among copy number (CN)-low subpopulation, were identified. Disulfidptosis-PSEC was a potential prognosis biomarker for EC with targetable biological process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.