ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2025
Alterations in magnitude and spatial distribution of erector spinae muscle activity in cyclists with a recent history of low back pain.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of experimental and clinical pain on the spatial distribution of muscle activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Electromyographic activity during bench press differs by attentional focus strategy and sport: a cross-sectional comparison of bodybuilding, powerlifting, and paralympic powerlifting.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Surface Electromyography Reveals Subject-Specific Alterations in Lumbar Flexion-Relaxation Following Prolonged Cycling in Pain-Free Road Cyclists.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fatigue-induced alterations in the spatial distribution of lumbar erector spinae activity in older versus young adults.European journal of applied physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWhile cycling offers several health benefits, repetitive loading and maintenance of static postures for prolonged periods expose cyclists to low back pain (LBP). Despite high LBP prevalence in cyclists, underlying pathomechanics and specific lumbar region muscle activation patterns during cycling are unclear. Here, we compared lumbar erector spinae (ES) muscles activation and spatial distribution activity in cyclists with and without recent LBP history.
methodsTen cyclists with recent LBP history (LBPG; Oswestry Disability Index score ~ 17.8%) and 11 healthy cyclists (CG) were recruited. After assessing the Functional Threshold Power (FTP), participants underwent an incremental cycling test with 4 × 3 min steps at 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% of their FTP. High-density surface electromyography (HDsEMG) signals were recorded from both lumbar ES using two 64-channel grids. Information about ES activation levels (root-mean-square, RMS), degree of homogeneity (entropy), and cranio-caudal displacement of muscle activity (Y-axis coordinate of the barycenter of RMS maps) was extracted from each grid separately and then grand-averaged across both grids.
resultsRepeated-measure 2-way ANOVAs showed a significant intensity by group interaction for RMS amplitude (p = 0.003), entropy (p = 0.038), and Y-bar displacement (p = 0.033). LBPG increased RMS amplitude between 70-100% (+ 19%, p = 0.010) and 80-100% FTP (+ 21%, p = 0.004) and decreased entropy between 70-100% FTP (- 8.4%, p = 0.003) and 80-100% FTP (- 8.5%, p = 0.002). Between-group differences emerged only at 100% FTP (+ 9.6%, p = 0.049) for RMS amplitude.
conclusionOur findings suggest that cyclists with recent LBP history exhibit higher ES muscles activation and less homogeneous activity compared to healthy controls, suggesting potential inefficient muscle recruitment strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: HEC-DSB/09-2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.