Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39365316›Full record

ReviewArchives of toxicology2025

Animal-free safety assessment of chemicals: an innovation system perspective.

Marjolein J Hoogstraaten, Jelle Vriend, Victoria C de Leeuw, Simona O Negro, Ellen H M Moors, Anne S Kienhuis, Jarno Hoekman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marjolein J Hoogstraaten *Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. M.J.Hoogstraaten@VU.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-6202-2350
Jelle Vriend *National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5758-0614
Victoria C de LeeuwNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3239-2227
Simona O NegroCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8532-0825
Ellen H M MoorsCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9724-5308
Anne S Kienhuis *National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6465-4498
Jarno Hoekman *Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2817-1229

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek NWA-ORC 1292.19.272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This perspective paper, which is the result of a collaborative effort between toxicologists and scholars in innovation and transition studies, presents a heuristic framework based on innovation system literature for understanding and appraising mission achievement to animal-free chemical safety assessment using New Approach Methodologies (NAMs). While scientific and technical challenges in this area are relatively well known, the recent establishment of missions and roadmaps to accelerate the acceptance and effective use of NAMs for chemical safety assessment raises new questions about how we can grasp the systemic nature of all changes needed in this transition. This includes recognising broader societal, institutional, and regulatory shifts necessary for NAM acceptance and uptake. Our paper discusses how the innovation system approach offers insights into key processes and associated activities that include as well as transcend the technical and scientific realm, and can help to accelerate acceptance and uptake of NAMs. Based on these insights, we present a comprehensive framework that, next to scientific and technological developments, recognises the need for coordinated efforts in areas like education, training, funding, policy-making, and public engagement to promote the acceptance and uptake of NAMs. Our framework can be used to perform structural and functional analyses of the innovation system of NAMs and animal-free safety assessment and as such provides handholds to track progress and organise collective efforts of actors to make sure we are moving in the right direction.

Indexed as

Animal Testing AlternativesChemical SafetyToxicity TestsAnimalsHumansRisk AssessmentAnimal-free chemical safety assessmentInnovation systemsNew approach methodologiesToxicologyTransitions

Identifiers

PMID39365316
PMCPMC11742464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.