ReviewCurrent opinion in cardiology2025
Electrographic flow mapping of atrial fibrillation.
Review in Current opinion in cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A single-center trial of electrographic flow mapping and concomitant voltage mapping in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation (FLOW EVAL-AF).Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Trial
- Electrographic flow (EGF) mapping reveals sex-based differences in EGF patterns with women concentrated in phenotypes that benefit from EGF-guided ablation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- AF-FLOW Global Registry Confirms Validity of Electrographic Flow Mapping as a Phenotyping Tool for Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2025Observational
- Electrographic Flow Mapping Provides Prognosis for AF Ablation Outcomes Across Two Independent Prospective Patient Cohorts.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewA low ceiling of efficacy exists for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation via pulmonary vein isolation without adjunctive ablations, which is likely because they do not target an individual patient's specific underlying disease mechanisms. Electrographic flow (EGF) mapping is the first system that reliably displays wavefront propagation through the atria. It is a promising tool for localizing sources of atrial fibrillation, guiding targeted ablation, and visualizing conduction through the atrial substrate. RECENT
findingsWe describe EGF mapping with emphasis on contemporary studies examining map reproducibility and use cases in the preclinical and clinical environment. Animal experiments demonstrated that maps were interpretable across increasingly complex rhythms with pacing during spontaneously persistent atrial fibrillation reliably simulating EGF sources. The FLOW-AF randomized controlled trial showed that source ablation improved outcomes and that EGF map properties may be used to phenotype patients based on their atrial fibrillation mechanisms and recurrence likelihoods. SUMMARY: Targeted ablation strategies balance the risks of insufficiently ablating atrial fibrillation triggers with exacerbating disease through additional scar formation. EGF mapping leverages spatiotemporal relationships in voltage to localize sources and quantify substrate health. Further research is needed to optimize phenotyping and treatment efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.