Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39365178›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2024

Bayesian Probabilistic Inference of Nonparametric Distance Distributions in DEER Spectroscopy.

Sarah R Sweger, Julian C Cheung, Lukas Zha, Stephan Pribitzer, Stefan Stoll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Frequency and time domainPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah R SwegerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.
Julian C CheungDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-9534-7158
Lukas ZhaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.
Stephan PribitzerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.
Stefan StollDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4255-9550

Funding

Structural mechanisms for gating of bacterial cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channelsR01GM127325 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ZAGOTTA, WILLIAM N · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
Equipment Supplement: DEER spectroscopy tools for probing protein conformational dynamicsR35GM151956 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Stefan Stoll · 2024 to 2026
$1.4M
Equipment Supplement: Analysis tools for quantifying protein conformational landscapes using DEER spectroscopyR01GM125753 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STOLL, STEFAN · 2019 to 2022
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM125753NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127325NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM151956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Double electron-electron resonance (DEER) spectroscopy measures distance distributions between spin labels in proteins, yielding important structural and energetic information about conformational landscapes. Analysis of an experimental DEER signal in terms of a distance distribution is a nontrivial task due to the ill-posed nature of the underlying mathematical inversion problem. This work introduces a Bayesian probabilistic inference approach to analyze DEER data, assuming a nonparametric distance distribution with a Tikhonov smoothness prior. The method uses Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling with a compositional Gibbs sampler to determine a posterior probability distribution over the entire parameter space, including the distance distribution, given an experimental data set. This posterior contains all of the information available from the data, including a full quantification of the uncertainty about the model parameters. The corresponding uncertainty about the distance distribution is visually captured via an ensemble of posterior predictive distributions. Several examples are presented to illustrate the method. Compared with bootstrapping, it performs faster and provides slightly larger uncertainty intervals.

Identifiers

PMID39365178
PMCPMC11801007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.