ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2024
Bayesian Probabilistic Inference of Nonparametric Distance Distributions in DEER Spectroscopy.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in quantifying protein conformational ensembles with dipolar EPR spectroscopy.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025Review
- Frequency and time domainPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Double electron-electron resonance (DEER) spectroscopy measures distance distributions between spin labels in proteins, yielding important structural and energetic information about conformational landscapes. Analysis of an experimental DEER signal in terms of a distance distribution is a nontrivial task due to the ill-posed nature of the underlying mathematical inversion problem. This work introduces a Bayesian probabilistic inference approach to analyze DEER data, assuming a nonparametric distance distribution with a Tikhonov smoothness prior. The method uses Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling with a compositional Gibbs sampler to determine a posterior probability distribution over the entire parameter space, including the distance distribution, given an experimental data set. This posterior contains all of the information available from the data, including a full quantification of the uncertainty about the model parameters. The corresponding uncertainty about the distance distribution is visually captured via an ensemble of posterior predictive distributions. Several examples are presented to illustrate the method. Compared with bootstrapping, it performs faster and provides slightly larger uncertainty intervals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.