Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39364774›Full record

Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2024

The effect of two speech and language approaches on speech problems in people with Parkinson's disease: the PD COMM RCT.

Catherine M Sackley, Caroline Rick, Marian C Brady, Christopher Burton, Sue Jowett, Smitaa Patel, Rebecca Woolley, Patricia Masterson-Algar, Avril Nicoll, Christina H Smith and 8 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Catherine M SackleyPopulation Health Sciences, Addison House, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8580-6622
Caroline RickNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7713-9834
Marian C BradyNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4589-7021
Christopher BurtonSchool of Allied and Public Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1159-1494
Sue JowettHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8936-3745
Smitaa PatelBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4997-3829
Rebecca WoolleyBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5119-1431
Patricia Masterson-AlgarSchool of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6344-1346
Avril NicollNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9677-4817
Christina H SmithDivision of Psychology and Language Science, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7803-9616
Zainab AbdaliHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2736-5427
Natalie IvesBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1664-7541
Gillian BeatonQueen Elizabeth Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8539-9318
Sylvia DicksonNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4137-5752
Ryan OttridgeBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8685-2145
Helen NankervisPopulation Health Sciences, Addison House, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4352-1626
Carl E ClarkeInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2478-3436
PD COMM Collaborative Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Speech impairments are common with Parkinson's disease (reported prevalence 68%), increasing conversational demands, reliance on family and social withdrawal. Objective(s): The PD COMM trial compared the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two speech and language therapy approaches: Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD and National Health Service speech and language therapy for the treatment of speech or voice problems in people with Parkinson's disease to no speech and language therapy (control) and against each other. Design: PD COMM is a phase III, multicentre, three-arm, unblinded, randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomised in a 1 : 1 : 1 ratio to control, National Health Service speech and language therapy or Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD via a central computer-generated programme, using a minimisation procedure with a random element, to ensure allocation concealment. Mixed-methods process and health economic evaluations were conducted. Setting: United Kingdom outpatient and home settings. Participants: People with idiopathic Parkinson's disease, with self-reported or carer-reported speech or voice problems. We excluded people with dementia, laryngeal pathology and those within 24 months of previous speech and language therapy. Interventions: The Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD intervention included maximum effort drills and high-effort speech production tasks delivered over four 50-minute therapist-led personalised sessions per week, for 4 weeks with prescribed daily home practice. National Health Service speech and language therapy content and dosage reflected local non-Lee Silverman Voice Treatment speech and language therapy practices, usually 1 hour, once weekly, for 6 weeks. Trained, experienced speech and language therapists or assistants provided interventions. The control was no speech and language therapy until the trial was completed. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome: Voice Handicap Index total score at 3 months. Secondary outcomes: Voice Handicap Index subscales, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39; Questionnaire on Acquired Speech Disorders; EuroQol-5D-5L; ICEpop Capabilities Measure for Older Adults; Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire - Carers; resource utilisation; and adverse events. Assessments were completed pre-randomisation and at 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation. Results: Three hundred and eighty-eight participants were randomised to Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD ( Limitations: The number of participants recruited to the trial did not meet the pre-specified power. Conclusions: People that had access to Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD described a significantly greater reduction in the impact of their Parkinson's disease-related speech problems 3 months after randomisation compared to people that had no speech and language therapy. There was no evidence of a difference between National Health Service speech and language therapy and those that received no speech and language therapy. Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD resulted in a significantly lower impact of voice problems compared to National Health Service speech and language therapy 3 months after randomisation which was still present after 12 months; however, Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD was not found to be cost-effective. Future work: Implementing Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD in the National Health Service and identifying alternatives to Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD for those who cannot tolerate it. Investigation of less costly alternative options for Lee Silverman Voice Treatment delivery require investigation, with economic evaluation using a preference-based outcome measure that captures improvement in communication. Study registration: This study is registered as ISRCTN12421382. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 10/135/02) and is published in full in

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisLanguage TherapyParkinson DiseaseSpeech DisordersSpeech TherapyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of LifeState MedicineUnited KingdomCOST-BENEFIT ANALYSISDATA ANALYSISDELIVERY OF HEALTH CAREDYSARTHRIAECONOMIC EVALUATIONIDIOPATHIC PARKINSON’S DISEASELEE SILVERMAN VOICE TREATMENTNORMALISATION PROCESS THEORYPROCESS EVALUATIONQUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS REHABILITATIONQUALITY OF LIFE DYSARTHRIARANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALREHABILITATIONSOCIAL THEORYSPEECH AND LANGUAGE THERAPISTSPEECH AND LANGUAGE THERAPY

Identifiers

PMID39364774
PMCPMC11474952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.