ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2024
[Corrigendum] Effects of miR‑340 overexpression and knockdown on the proliferation and metastasis of NSCLC cell lines.
Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following the publication of the above article, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that, with the 'Adjacent' row (top row) of immunohistochemical images shown in Fig. 2 on p. 646, the fourth and fifth panels along (the 'RAB11A' and 'RAB9A' data panels) contained an overlapping section of data, such that data which were intended to show the results from differently performed experiments had apparently been derived from the same original source. After consulting their original data, the authors were able to determine that the duplication of these panels had inadvertently occurred during the process of compiling Fig. 2. The revised version of Fig. 2, featuring the correct data for the 'Adjacent/RAB9A' experiment, is shown below. The authors confirm that the error associated with this figure did not have any significant impact on either the results or the conclusions reported in this study, and are grateful to the Editor of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.