Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39364704›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of medicine2024

Efficacy of dupilumab on chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and concomitant asthma in biologic-naive and biologic-pretreated patients.

María Sandra Domínguez-Sosa, María Soledad Cabrera-Ramírez, Miriam Del Carmen Marrero-Ramos, Delia Dávila-Quintana, Carlos Cabrera-López, Heleia González Cuervo, Jesús Javier Benítez Del Rosario, Teresa Carrillo-Díaz

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modifying the course of asthma: mechanisms and strategies for clinical remission.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

María Sandra Domínguez-SosaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9445-4537
María Soledad Cabrera-RamírezDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Miriam Del Carmen Marrero-RamosDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Delia Dávila-QuintanaDepartment of Quantitative Methods in Economics and Management, Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Carlos Cabrera-LópezDepartment of Pneumology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Heleia González CuervoDepartment of Allergology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Jesús Javier Benítez Del RosarioDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Teresa Carrillo-DíazDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDupilumab, an anti-IL-4 receptor monoclonal antibody (mAb), was recently approved for the treatment of severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The main objective of this study was to assess whether previous exposure to biological treatment affected the clinical outcomes in CRSwNP and asthma patients, treated with dupilumab over time. A collateral secondary objective was to analyse the effects over time of dupilumab in patients with and without aeroallergen sensitization.

methodsSingle-centre retrospective observational study on severe CRSwNP patients treated with dupilumab. Nasal polyp score (NPS), visual analogue scale (VAS) symptom score, sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22), aeroallergen sensitization, total serum IgE levels, and blood eosinophil counts were assessed at baseline and after 4, 6 and 12 months.

results42 patients were included, 40 (95.2%) had asthma. Twenty-one (50%) patients received dupilumab without prior biological treatment (Group A: naive) and 50% switched to dupilumab from previous biological treatment (Group B: pre-treated). NPS, VAS symptoms, SNOT-22 improved significantly after 12 months treatment in both groups of patients (

conclusionsDupilumab improves symptom severity, polyp size, and health-related quality of life, regardless of the presence or absence of comorbid aeroallergen sensitization and previous administration of biologic therapy.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAsthmaNasal PolypsRhinitisSinusitisAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin EMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRhinosinusitisTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizeddupilumabImmunoglobulin EChronic rhinosinusitisdupilumabmonoclonal antibodynasal polypsperennial allergen sensitization

Identifiers

PMID39364704
PMCPMC11457478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.