Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39364589›Full record

Trial reportHeadache2025

Assessment of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between zavegepant and sumatriptan: A phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled study in healthy adults.

Rajinder Bhardwaj, Mary K Donohue, Jennifer Madonia, Kyle Matschke, Matt S Anderson, Beth Morris, Richard Bertz, Robert Croop, Jing Liu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in Headache, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rajinder BhardwajCertara USA, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Mary K DonohueBiohaven Pharmaceuticals Inc., New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Jennifer MadoniaBiohaven Pharmaceuticals Inc., New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Kyle MatschkePfizer Inc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Matt S AndersonCertara USA, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Beth MorrisBiohaven Pharmaceuticals Inc., New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Richard BertzBiohaven Pharmaceuticals Inc., New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Robert CroopBiohaven Pharmaceuticals Inc., New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Jing LiuPfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

This study was supported by Biohaven Pharmaceuticals Inc., which was acquired by Pfizer in October 2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between zavegepant and sumatriptan in healthy adults.

backgroundZavegepant is a high-affinity, selective, small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist administered as a nasal spray approved in the United States for the acute treatment of migraine. Triptans, including sumatriptan, are a different class of drugs for acute migraine treatment and are associated with a risk of increased blood pressure (BP). Hence, it is important to study the drug-drug interactions between zavegepant and sumatriptan due to potential coadministration in clinical settings.

methodsThis was a Phase 1, single-center, partially blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-arm study. Eligible participants were males aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 40 years or females aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 50 years. On Day 1, participants received sumatriptan 2 × 6 mg subcutaneous injections (1 h apart) and were then randomized (6:1 ratio) to receive zavegepant 2 × 10 mg nasal spray (1 in each nostril) or placebo on Days 2 and 3. On Day 4, zavegepant or placebo was coadministered with sumatriptan after the second sumatriptan injection. BP, PK, and safety were evaluated at pre-specified time points.

resultsForty-two participants enrolled in the study received at least one dose of any treatment and were included in the safety analyses. Forty-one participants who completed the study were included in the BP and PK analyses. The mean (standard deviation) time-weighted average (TWA) of mean arterial pressure (MAP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 87.2 (6.8) vs. sumatriptan 86.9 (6.0)]), diastolic BP (DBP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 72.3 (6.8) vs. sumatriptan 72.1 (6.2)]), and systolic BP (SBP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 116.8 (10.2) vs. sumatriptan 116.2 (8.6)]) did not change following zavegepant and sumatriptan coadministration on Day 4 compared to sumatriptan alone on Day 1. Statistical comparisons of the TWA of MAP, DBP, and SBP between sumatriptan and zavegepant coadministration and sumatriptan alone were similar; the differences observed were 0.04 mmHg for MAP (90% confidence interval [CI]: -0.69, 0.77 mmHg), 0.00 mmHg for DBP (90% CI: -0.76, 0.76 mmHg), and 0.33 mmHg for SBP (90% CI: -0.97, 1.63 mmHg). Sumatriptan PK after sumatriptan and zavegepant coadministration versus sumatriptan alone was similar; the comparison ratios were 102.5% (90% CI: 100.7%, 104.2%) for AUC

conclusionCoadministration of zavegepant with sumatriptan was safe and without PD or PK interactions in healthy adults.

Indexed as

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsSumatriptanAdolescentAdultBlood PressureDrug InteractionsFemaleHumansIndazolesMaleMiddle AgedQuinolonesSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsIndazolesN-(3-(7-methyl-1H-indazol-5-yl)-1-(4-(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)-1-oxopropan-2-yl))-4-(2-oxo-1,2-dihydroquinolin-3-yl)piperidine-1-carboxamideQuinolonesSumatriptanblood pressuredrug–drug interactionpharmacokineticssumatriptanzavegepant

Identifiers

PMID39364589
PMCPMC11794967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.