ArticleCureus2024
Assessing Placental Shear Wave Elastography as a Tool for Evaluating Preeclampsia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Value of multimodal ultrasound assessment of placental dysfunction in gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, especially its dreaded complication preeclampsia, remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality for both the mother and the fetus. Existing tools for the prediction of preeclampsia remain inadequate in their sensitivity and specificity. Hence, there is an urgent need for a reliable, economically feasible, and objective marker for its diagnosis/early prediction. In this regard, shear wave elastography has shown great promise. Shear wave elastography is a novel method to quantify tissue stiffness, which is objective and has significantly lower inter-observer variability. Objectives We aim to quantify the tissue elasticity using point shear wave elastography (pSWE) in the placentas of diagnosed cases of preeclampsia and to compare them with the placentas of healthy controls in order to evaluate if there is a significant statistical difference between the two. Materials and methods This comparative study was conducted at the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, India, from August 2022 to July 2024. The study included 60 participants, divided into two groups: 30 patients with preeclampsia and 30 healthy pregnancies. Placental stiffness was measured using a Samsung HS70A ultrasound machine (Samsung Electronics Pvt. Ltd., Seoul, South Korea), and pSWE was performed with a curvilinear probe. Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21 (Released 2012; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), and the significance of differences between the two groups was assessed using an independent t-test with a p-value of <0.05, considered statistically significant. Results The mean placental stiffness, measured in kilopascals (kPa), was significantly higher in the preeclampsia group (11.71 ± 1.52 kPa) in comparison to the healthy group (3.36 ± 0.66 kPa) (p = 0.001). Patients suffering from preeclampsia were found to have significantly higher levels of placental stiffness. Conclusion Early diagnosis remains key to managing preeclampsia so that adequate monitoring and treatment could be provided to the patients. Our study showed that there is a significant statistical difference in the placental stiffness in patients with preeclampsia in comparison to a healthy placenta. Hence, shear wave elastography can be used as a supplementary tool to aid in the diagnosis/prediction of preeclampsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.