Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39364477›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Immersive Virtual Learning Environments for Healthcare Education: State-of-Art and Open Problems.

Bill Kapralos

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bill KapralosmaxSIMhealth Group, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, CAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immersive virtual learning environments (iVLEs), serious games and virtual simulations in particular, allow trainees to learn from virtual simulated experiences in an interactive, engaging, and ethically safe manner. Although the use of iVLEs in healthcare education was steadily growing over the last 10-15 years, their use was accelerated during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic as they played a significant role in facilitating remote learning during the pandemic-related lock-downs. Within healthcare education, iVLEs are not so much technologies of the future but rather, of the present. Educators are finding innovative ways to leverage the coupling of iVLEs and emerging technologies such as extended reality (augmented, mixed, and virtual realities), and artificial intelligence (AI), to transform healthcare education. Despite the growing popularity and benefits of iVLEs, there are several issues/limitations in their current form including the following three that particularly limit their use. More specifically, iVLEs typically i) contain fixed/static scenarios leading to predictability, disengagement, and repetition in learning experiences, ii) emphasize cognitive skills in contrast to psychomotor skills given the difficulties and cost associated in simulating the sense of touch which is inherent in psychomotor-based tasks, and iii) are not inclusive and therefore, do not properly address user diversity and accessibility. With a focus on healthcare education, this article begins with an overview of iVLEs, followed by a discussion regarding these limitations and potential solutions to overcome these limitations.

Indexed as

augmented realityhealthcare educationimmersive virtual learning environment (ivle)serious gamevirtual realityvirtual simulation

Identifiers

PMID39364477
PMCPMC11446735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.