ReviewCureus2024
Hydrocephalus: A Review of Etiology-Driven Treatment Strategies.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative assessment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and obstructive hydrocephalus based on glymphatic parameters.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Lysophosphatidic Acid (LPA) Salivary Species Detection and Whole-mount LPA Receptor Localization in Mouse Salivary Gland.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Etiology and Risk Factors for Shunt Revision in Adult Hydrocephalus: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Ventricular Anatomy Across CT and MRI in Hydrocephalus: A Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Surgical resection of a solid posterior cranial fossa hemangioblastoma causing obstructive hydrocephalus in a pediatric patient.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Volumetric Assessment of Perimesencephalic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydrocephalus is a broad term usually understood as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) accumulation resulting in cerebral ventricular system expansion. The production of CSF is by the choroid plexus in lateral ventricles, flowing between the third and fourth ventricles and eventually to the subarachnoid space. It is critical for proper neuronal function. Hydrocephalus is a neurological pathology linked to high morbidity from neurocognitive and motor impairment. It is classified as either communicating or non-communicating. Communicating hydrocephalus is understood as a deficit at cranial arachnoid villi and granulation absorption sites. However, there has been evidence that extracranial lymphatic vessels in the ethmoid bone region also play a role, as indicated by decreased lymphatic absorption in rat models of hydrocephalus. Treatment typically involves surgical shunt placement or endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) technique with or without choroid plexus cauterization (CPC). These surgical interventions have high failure risks and complications that require re-intervention, further increasing morbidity and mortality risks. To date, there are few nonsurgical treatment strategies, but many have proved limited benefit, and many patients still require surgery. This analysis lays out the typical treatments and explores new, innovative interventions by highlighting the active role of brain parenchymal tissue in the pathogenesis of hydrocephalus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.