ArticleCureus2024
Inflammatory Foot Dermatoses: The Correlation Among Morphological Patterns, Histopathological Findings, and Patch Test Positivity.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective In this study, we aimed to investigate the correlation between the clinical diagnosis, histological diagnosis, and patch test positivity among patients with foot dermatoses receiving treatment at the Department of Dermatology, MES Medical College, Perinthalmanna. Methodology A hospital-based cross-sectional observational diagnostic evaluation was carried out from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, among 44 patients with foot dermatoses who met the inclusion criteria. A thorough general physical and cutaneous examination was performed to determine the type, extent, and morphology of lesions after obtaining the written informed consent; sociodemographic information and a thorough recording of patient history were gathered. In all cases, a potassium hydroxide (KOH) mount, skin biopsy, and patch testing were performed. Additionally, pus culture and sensitivity tests were conducted in pertinent cases. Results Our study found that the most prevalent foot dermatosis, based on clinical diagnosis, was allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) foot, affecting 26 patients (59.0%). This was followed by plantar psoriasis, observed in 13 patients (29.5%), and lichen planus, present in two patients (4.5%). The predominant histological diagnosis was ACD foot in 11 patients (25.0%), followed by plantar psoriasis in 10 patients (22.7%), spongiotic dermatitis in seven patients (15.9%), atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasiform dermatitis in four patients (9.1%) each, and tinea pedis in two patients (4.5%). The sensitivity of patch testing in detecting ACD foot was 90.91%, whereas its specificity was 57.58%. The positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were 41.67% and 95.0% respectively. Conclusions Based on our findings, histopathological evaluation is a highly effective diagnostic technique for foot dermatoses, as it demonstrated exceptional diagnostic accuracy (p<0.001). The sensitivity of patch testing in identifying ACD of the foot was 90.91% (p<0.05). This highlighted the usefulness of patch testing as a confirmatory diagnostic tool along with histopathological evaluation for precise diagnosis of ACD of the foot. While laboratory testing can increase diagnostic precision, it cannot replace a clinical examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.