ArticleCureus2024
A Retrospective Study of Routine Preoperative Blood Grouping and Saving in Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Minimally Utilized Expenditure.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic appendicectomy typically undergo routine preoperative blood grouping and saving (G&S). Despite the low incidence of blood transfusion in this context, the acquisition and processing of G&S samples incur a cost of £31 ($40) per sample. This study aims to review blood transfusion usage in these procedures to determine whether routine G&S sampling is clinically necessary or represents an avoidable expense. Methods A retrospective case note analysis was conducted on patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic appendicectomy from January 2019 to June 2020. Collected data included the timing of G&S, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, timing of blood transfusions, and the number of units transfused. Results Six hundred and thirteen patients were involved in the study. Among the 323 patients who had laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 256 (78.8%) underwent preoperative G&S sampling. Of the 290 patients who had laparoscopic appendicectomy, 190 (65.5%) received preoperative G&S sampling. Notably, none of the 613 patients required a blood transfusion within 30 days of their surgery. The total cost of G&S for the cohort amounted to £22,196 ($28,425). Conclusions The findings suggest that routine G&S sampling is an unnecessary expenditure for patients undergoing elective laparoscopic appendicectomy or cholecystectomy. It is recommended that G&S sampling be reserved for high-risk groups to optimize resource allocation and reduce unnecessary costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.