ArticlePulmonary circulation2024
COPD associated pulmonary hypertension: A post hoc analysis of the PERFECT study.
Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension: Mechanistic Insights, Clinical Challenges, and Evolving Therapies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The clinical relevance of chest computed tomography imaging in pulmonary hypertension associated with lung diseases.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2026Review
- Highlights of the 2026 Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute Conference: Celebrating 20 Years of Progress and Innovation.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
- Prevalence, pathogenesis, and clinical impact of pulmonary hypertension associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Right Ventricular Phenotyping Can Lead to Pulmonary Vascular Therapy Response in Those with Pulmonary Hypertension with COPD: A Single-Center Cohort Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Scoring System for Prediction of Tolerance to Inhaled Treprostinil in Patients with PAH or PH-ILD.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Cluster analysis identifies quantitative CT imaging-based subgroups in COPD subjects with pulmonary artery enlargement.The European respiratory journal · 2025Article
- Chest Computed Tomography to Improve Phenotyping in Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
- COPD associated pulmonary hypertension: A post hoc analysis of the PERFECT study.Pulmonary circulation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The PERFECT study, a randomized, controlled, double-blind study of inhaled treprostinil in patients with COPD and associated pulmonary hypertension (PH-COPD) was a negative trial that was terminated early. The reason(s) for the negative outcome remains uncertain. A post hoc analysis of data from the PERFECT study was undertaken to identify adverse responders and possibly potential responders. The goal was also to provide insight into phenotypes for possible inclusion and exclusion in future PH-COPD clinical trials. An adverse response on active treatment was seen in 36.4% (24/66) of the subjects compared to 27.6% (16/58) on placebo. There was no evidence to suggest that hyperinflation, bronchospasm, or occult heart failure played any role in the untoward outcomes of the study. The patients who died during the study all had baseline diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide ≤25% of predicted. Evidence of a potential response was seen in 10.6% (7/66) of the patients who received inhaled treprostinil. Patients who had evidence of a treatment response had a baseline mean pulmonary artery pressure of ≥40 mmHg and a forced expiratory volume in the first second of ≥40%. Change in N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide did not predict clinical response. This post hoc analysis provides information that may potentially enable improved selection of patients for future therapeutic trials in PH-COPD. These analyses are post hoc, observational, and exploratory. The thresholds defining the spectrum of responders are preliminary and may require further refinement and validation in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.