Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39364396›Full record

ArticleForensic sciences research2024

Piece by piece-a computer-aided method for virtual re-association of commingled fragmented remains.

Lise Malfroy Camine, Virginie Magnin, Ruben Soto, Christine Bruguier, Silke Grabherr, Vincent Varlet, Negahnaz Moghaddam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic sciences research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lise Malfroy CamineUniversity Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Virginie MagninForensic Imaging and Anthropology Unit, University Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ruben SotoForensic Imaging and Anthropology Unit, University Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christine BruguierForensic Imaging and Anthropology Unit, University Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Silke GrabherrUniversity Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Vincent VarletSwiss Human Institute of Forensic Taphonomy, University Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Negahnaz MoghaddamSwiss Human Institute of Forensic Taphonomy, University Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Air crashes or explosions with numerous victims may result in thousands of fragmented human remains that present a massive challenge for disaster victim identification teams. Genetic identification may present important financial and technical limits, and the physical re-association of fractured bones by forensic anthropologists may require a time-consuming phase of cleaning and drying. A virtual re-association (VRA) of fragmented human remains using postmortem computed tomography (CT)-scan images could enhance the identification process and reduce the number of genetic analyses required. Therefore, this study investigated the advantages and limitations of a VRA protocol in comparison with physical re-association (PRA) in a laboratory setting and in a real case scenario. As a first step, six porcine femurs were scanned by multi-detector CT before and after physical fragmentation. PRA of the dry bones and VRA of the 3D models of the fragments were then performed. The physically reconstructed dry bones were then once more scanned with CT. The mean distance between intact and reconstructed models, the number of re-associated fragments, and the time needed for the reconstruction were evaluated. In a second step, 87 fragmented remains resulting from a controlled pig bombing were collected, scanned, and virtually re-associated to test the feasibility of the protocol in a real context. The reconstruction of the femurs showed no difference in accuracy between PRA and VRA. Although the VRA was faster than PRA, the preparation of the material still needs to be taken into consideration. The VRA after the controlled pig bombing was limited to 8% of the total fragments. Differences in alveolar and cortical osseous structure and the presence of cartilage resulted in segmentation approximations and difficulties in the re-association itself. The explosion produced an important loss of intermediate bone elements. The VRA method still needs further evaluations with a larger sample size and different fragmentation mechanisms. However, the presented research shows promising results towards enhancing the efficiency of identifying individuals after a mass disaster. Key points: Mass disasters with highly fragmented bodies represent a major challenge for the disaster victim identification (DVI) teams.Using CT-scans of the fragments, a virtual re-association method could enhance the DVI process and reduce the number of genetic analysis required.A laboratory setting using porcine femurs shown that the VRA process could start earlier and was faster than the physical re-association.Although methodological limits were highlighted, and the efficiency of the method has to be re-evaluated, the controlled bombing showed that the VRA could be applied in a real case scenario.

Indexed as

3Ddisaster victim identificationforensic anthropologyfragmented human remainsvirtual re-association

Identifiers

PMID39364396
PMCPMC11446864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.