ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2024
Efficacy and safety of two Antivenoms in the treatment of eastern copperhead (
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Crotalidae Immune F(ab')2 (Equine) and Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine) at Establishing Control of Initial Envenomation Symptoms in Louisiana Agkistrodon Envenomations.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2025Article
- Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Rattlesnake Envenomation in Arizona Following Treatment With Crofab vs Anavip: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of two Antivenoms in the treatment of eastern copperhead (Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are two Food and Drug Administration-approved antivenoms for the treatment of North American pitviper envenomations: Crotalidae polyvalent immune fab (ovine) (CroFab, henceforth FabAV) and Crotalidae immune F(ab') Methods: We retrospectively reviewed eastern copperhead bites on which our toxicology service consulted between January 1, 2021 and November 1, 2023. Collected data included patient demographics, bite location, clinical features, antivenom use, response to treatment, and adverse reactions to antivenom. Results: There were 134 patients with confirmed copperhead envenomations. We administered antivenom to 89 patients, of which 36 (40%) were female. The median age was 42 years old (range: 2-89 years). Fifty-nine patients received Fab2AV and 30 were treated with FabAV. Initial control was achieved in 30 (100%) patients treated with FabAV. In the Fab2AV group, 53 (89.8%) achieved control; six patients with acute adverse reactions declined further treatment despite persistent symptoms. The median FabAV dose required for initial control was six vials (range: 4-6). A median dose of 10 vials (range: 10-30) was used in the Fab2AV group. Repeat doses of Fab2AV were required in 15 (25.4%) cases. There were no acute adverse reactions to FabAV. Acute adverse reactions were seen in seven (11.9%) of patients treated with Fab2AV. Conclusion: Fewer patients treated with FabAV required repeat antivenom dosing to attain initial control following eastern copperhead envenomation. A higher percentage of patients treated with Fab2AV developed acute adverse reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.