Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39364389›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2024

Efficacy and safety of two Antivenoms in the treatment of eastern copperhead (

Spencer Greene, Alexander Teshon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Efficacy and safety of two Antivenoms in the treatment of eastern copperhead (Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Spencer GreeneUniversity of Houston College of Medicine Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1119-5582
Alexander TeshonUniversity of Houston College of Medicine Houston Texas USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There are two Food and Drug Administration-approved antivenoms for the treatment of North American pitviper envenomations: Crotalidae polyvalent immune fab (ovine) (CroFab, henceforth FabAV) and Crotalidae immune F(ab') Methods: We retrospectively reviewed eastern copperhead bites on which our toxicology service consulted between January 1, 2021 and November 1, 2023. Collected data included patient demographics, bite location, clinical features, antivenom use, response to treatment, and adverse reactions to antivenom. Results: There were 134 patients with confirmed copperhead envenomations. We administered antivenom to 89 patients, of which 36 (40%) were female. The median age was 42 years old (range: 2-89 years). Fifty-nine patients received Fab2AV and 30 were treated with FabAV. Initial control was achieved in 30 (100%) patients treated with FabAV. In the Fab2AV group, 53 (89.8%) achieved control; six patients with acute adverse reactions declined further treatment despite persistent symptoms. The median FabAV dose required for initial control was six vials (range: 4-6). A median dose of 10 vials (range: 10-30) was used in the Fab2AV group. Repeat doses of Fab2AV were required in 15 (25.4%) cases. There were no acute adverse reactions to FabAV. Acute adverse reactions were seen in seven (11.9%) of patients treated with Fab2AV. Conclusion: Fewer patients treated with FabAV required repeat antivenom dosing to attain initial control following eastern copperhead envenomation. A higher percentage of patients treated with Fab2AV developed acute adverse reactions.

Indexed as

Agkistrodonantivenomcopperheadenvenomationsnakebite

Identifiers

PMID39364389
PMCPMC11447194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.