Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39364376›Full record

ArticleAPL machine learning2024

Dreaming of electrical waves: Generative modeling of cardiac excitation waves using diffusion models.

Tanish Baranwal, Jan Lebert, Jan Christoph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in APL machine learning, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jan LebertCardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8754-4964

Funding

AI-assisted Imaging and Prediction of Cardiac Arrhythmia Origins using 4D UltrasoundDP2HL168071 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHRISTOPH, JAN · 2022 to 2025
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS DP2 HL168071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical waves in the heart form rotating spiral or scroll waves during life-threatening arrhythmias, such as atrial or ventricular fibrillation. The wave dynamics are typically modeled using coupled partial differential equations, which describe reaction-diffusion dynamics in excitable media. More recently, data-driven generative modeling has emerged as an alternative to generate spatio-temporal patterns in physical and biological systems. Here, we explore denoising diffusion probabilistic models for the generative modeling of electrical wave patterns in cardiac tissue. We trained diffusion models with simulated electrical wave patterns to be able to generate such wave patterns in unconditional and conditional generation tasks. For instance, we explored the diffusion-based (i) parameter-specific generation, (ii) evolution, and (iii) inpainting of spiral wave dynamics, including reconstructing three-dimensional scroll wave dynamics from superficial two-dimensional measurements. Furthermore, we generated arbitrarily shaped bi-ventricular geometries and simultaneously initiated scroll wave patterns inside these geometries using diffusion. We characterized and compared the diffusion-generated solutions to solutions obtained with corresponding biophysical models and found that diffusion models learn to replicate spiral and scroll wave dynamics so well that they could be used for data-driven modeling of excitation waves in cardiac tissue. For instance, an ensemble of diffusion-generated spiral wave dynamics exhibits similar self-termination statistics as the corresponding ensemble simulated with a biophysical model. However, we also found that diffusion models produce artifacts if training data are lacking, e.g., during self-termination, and "hallucinate" wave patterns when insufficiently constrained.

Identifiers

PMID39364376
PMCPMC11446137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.