ArticleFrontiers in oral health2024
Three-dimensional secondary reconstruction of mistreated zygomatic fractures using patient specific surgical guides and implants.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bioprinting for craniofacial reconstruction: A review of advancements, clinical use, and challenges.Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The zygomatic bone has a great impact on the anterior and lateral projection of the midface as well as the proper position of the globe. Primary alignment of zygomatic fractures is very important as secondary reconstruction is far more challenging. Treatment of misaligned zygoma requires refracturing of the bone to allow for repositioning. Due to the great impact of the zygoma on the projection of the midface, a precise 3D realignment is of great importance. Technology nowadays develops rapidly and allows for superior results in many surgical fields. The use of patient specific surgical guides and fixation plates is becoming more abundant. Methods: Using 3D segmentation and design software, we developed a sequence for using 3D planning and printing both for the refracturing stage, avoiding a coronal approach, and for precise repositioning and fixation of the zygoma in the new position. Results: The method is described as well as a unique advanced 3D analysis, allowing for objectively assessing the results. Two cases are presented, including the design and post operative changes. Discussion: Pre-op, planned and final positions were compared and showed exceptional accuracy allowing for the elimination of human errors which are common in a 3D sensitive procedure such as refracturing of the zygoma. This method can easily be applied to other secondary reconstruction procedures requiring realignment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.