ArticleInternational medical case reports journal2024
Transient Consciousness Disorder During Emergency Cesarean Section in Patients with Labor Analgesia.
Article in International medical case reports journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A patient who was 39 weeks pregnant was admitted to the hospital to be expecting labor and performed labor analgesia when the uterine orifice was opened to 2 cm. We successfully performed L2.3 epidural puncture in the lumbar space and equipped her with a self-controlled epidural analgesia infusion pump (100mL, 10mL 1% ropivacaine + 50ug sufentanil + 89mL normal saline) with a load of 8mL for continuous delivery. Continuous infusion of 8mL/h, patient controlled analgesia (PCA) 6 mL/ time at 15 minute intervals. The analgesic effect is good. In the following 40 minutes or so, due to fetal monitoring, fetal heart rate variation deceleration accompanied by late deceleration, the minimum was reduced to 85 times/min, and there was no improvement after treatment, and then the obstetrician prepared to perform an emergency cesarean section. The anesthesiologist evaluated the patient and then chose an epidural. The epidural dose was 3mL 1% lidocaine +0.5% rox mixture, and 7mL 1% lidocaine +0.5% rox mixture was administered 3 minutes later. During the administration, the patient complained of unbearable headache and rapid loss of consciousness. Immediate organization rescue, uterine dissection, pressure oxygen, preparation of tracheal intubation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cardiovascular active drugs, etc. After about 1 minute, the patient regained consciousness, responded smoothly, the vital signs were stable, the anesthesia plane T8 was measured. The patient's surgery went smoothly, and there were no complications during postoperative follow-up. They were discharged 5 days later. Such cases are relatively rare, especially during cesarean section surgery has not been reported, so it is published for everyone's reference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.