Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39364333›Full record

Reviewnpj antimicrobials and resistance2024

Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in biofilms.

Ho Yu Liu, Emma L Prentice, Mark A Webber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in npj antimicrobials and resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 273 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
273citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

273 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. High resolution cryo-EM structure of theJournal of structural biology: X · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

213 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ho Yu LiuQuadram Institute Biosciences, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UQ UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6425-8260
Emma L PrenticeQuadram Institute Biosciences, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UQ UK.
Mark A WebberQuadram Institute Biosciences, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UQ UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9169-7592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most bacteria in nature exist in aggregated communities known as biofilms, and cells within a biofilm demonstrate major physiological changes compared to their planktonic counterparts. Biofilms are associated with many different types of infections which can have severe impacts on patients. Infections involving a biofilm component are often chronic and highly recalcitrant to antibiotic therapy as a result of intrinsic physical factors including extracellular matrix production, low growth rates, altered antibiotic target production and efficient exchange of resistance genes. This review describes the biofilm lifecycle, phenotypic characteristics of a biofilm, and contribution of matrix and persister cells to biofilms intrinsic tolerance to antimicrobials. We also describe how biofilms can evolve antibiotic resistance and transfer resistance genes within biofilms. Multispecies biofilms and the impacts of various interactions, including cooperation and competition, between species on tolerance to antimicrobials in polymicrobial biofilm communities are also discussed.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceBacteriology

Identifiers

PMID39364333
PMCPMC11445061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.