ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Understanding Patient Satisfaction: A Comparative Analysis of Telemedicine versus In-person Encounters in Pediatric Plastic Surgery.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Telemedicine follow-up after pediatric esophageal atresia repair: parental satisfaction and safety outcomes.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Telemedicine in Plastic Surgery: Satisfaction, Safety, and the Need for Ethical and Regulatory Frameworks.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine services experienced unprecedented growth during the coronavirus 2019 pandemic, offering patients remote access to care while minimizing exposures to possible infection. Our institution has one of the country's largest pediatric plastic surgery divisions and serves both a prominent metro area and sprawling rural community. Given the increasing utilization of telemedicine across several surgical subspecialties, this study aims to evaluate patient satisfaction following pediatric plastic surgery telemedicine encounters. Methods: Press Ganey surveys were completed by parents or guardians of pediatric plastic surgery patients after in-person or telemedicine encounters with a single surgeon. Surveys were gathered from March 2020 to December 2022. Only 13 of the 25 survey questions were applicable to both in-person and telemedicine encounters and were included for analysis. Top box scores (the proportion of patients who selected the highest rating) were compared using Fisher exact test. Results: Completed surveys were available for both groups from June 2020 to November 2022. A total of 223 surveys met inclusion criteria; there were 159 in-person encounters and 64 telemedicine encounters. Telemedicine encounters consistently had top box scores comparable to, or greater than, in-person encounters for all 13 survey questions. Statistically significant differences were observed for ease of contacting the practice ( Conclusions: Pediatric plastic surgery encounters completed via telemedicine demonstrate high patient satisfaction, exceeding in-person encounters for accessibility and convenience. Our study provides objective data about the patient experience and emphasizes the value of integrating telemedicine into pediatric plastic surgery practices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.