Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39364271›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Changes in memory and cognition during the SARS-CoV-2 human challenge study.

William Trender, Peter J Hellyer, Ben Killingley, Mariya Kalinova, Alex J Mann, Andrew P Catchpole, David Menon, Edward Needham, Ryan Thwaites, Christopher Chiu and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04865237 (A Dose Finding Human Experimental Infection Study in Healthy Subjects Using a GMP-produced SARS-COV-2 Wild Type Strain), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04865237 nacompletednot on this map

A Dose Finding Human Experimental Infection Study in Healthy Subjects Using a GMP-produced SARS-COV-2 Wild Type Strain

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2021 to 2022Enrolled36ConditionsCovid19, SARS-CoV Infection, Corona Virus Infection, CoronavirusArmsSARS-CoV-2 Virus 1x10^1 TCID50, Remdesivir, SARS-CoV-2 Virus 1x10^2 TCID50, SARS-CoV-2 Virus 1x10^3 TCID50
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cognitive consequences of COVID-19 infection: current evidence and future directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Neuroimmune pathophysiology of long COVID.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of Small-Molecule Candidates as Modulators of M-Type KInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

William TrenderDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK.
Peter J HellyerInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Ben KillingleyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Mariya KalinovaHVIVO Services Ltd., London, UK.
Alex J MannHVIVO Services Ltd., London, UK.
Andrew P CatchpoleHVIVO Services Ltd., London, UK.
David MenonCambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, UK.
Edward NeedhamCambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, UK.
Ryan ThwaitesNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Christopher ChiuDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Gregory ScottDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK.
Adam HampshireDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcomes and cross-sectional evidence show an association between COVID-19 and persistent cognitive problems. The causal basis, longevity and domain specificity of this association is unclear due to population variability in baseline cognitive abilities, vulnerabilities, virus variants, vaccination status and treatment. Methods: Thirty-four young, healthy, seronegative volunteers were inoculated with Wildtype SARS-CoV-2 under prospectively controlled conditions. Volunteers completed daily physiological measurements and computerised cognitive tasks during quarantine and follow-up at 30, 90, 180, 270, and 360 days. Linear modelling examined differences between 'infected' and 'inoculated but uninfected' individuals. The main cognitive endpoint was the baseline corrected global cognitive composite score across the battery of tasks administered to the volunteers. Exploratory cognitive endpoints included baseline corrected scores from individual tasks. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT04865237 and took place between March 2021 and July 2022. Findings: Eighteen volunteers developed infection by qPCR criteria of sustained viral load, one without symptoms and the remainder with mild illness. Infected volunteers showed statistically lower baseline-corrected global composite cognitive scores than uninfected volunteers, both acutely and during follow up (mean difference over all time points = -0.8631, 95% CI = -1.3613, -0.3766) with significant main effect of group in repeated measures ANOVA (F (1,34) = 7.58, p = 0.009). Sensitivity analysis replicated this cross-group difference after controlling for community upper respiratory tract infection, task-learning, remdesivir treatment, baseline reference and model structure. Memory and executive function tasks showed the largest between-group differences. No volunteers reported persistent subjective cognitive symptoms. Interpretation: These results support larger cross sectional findings indicating that mild Wildtype SARS-CoV-2 infection can be followed by small changes in cognition and memory that persist for at least a year. The mechanistic basis and clinical implications of these small changes remain unclear. Funding: This study was funded through the UK Vaccine Taskforce of the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) of Her Majesty's Government. WT was funded by the EPSRC through the CDT for Neurotechnology Imperial College London.

Indexed as

Baseline correctedCognitionCOVID-19Human challenge studySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39364271
PMCPMC11447363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.