ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2024
Effectiveness of Standard Therapy for Acne Vulgaris Based on Clinical Practice Guidelines in Indonesia.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioassay-Guided Evaluation and LC-MS/MS Characterization of FiveMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of acne vulgaris patient care in outpatient clinics: guideline adherence and patient education.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2026Observational
- Comparative Profile of Microbiome in Normal Skin and Acne Vulgaris Skin Patients.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of standard therapy for acne vulgaris based on Indonesian guidelines. Patients and Methods: New patients with acne vulgaris at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, the national referral center in Indonesia, who met the criteria were included in this study. Patients were treated with standard therapy for acne vulgaris based on the 2017 guidelines of Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, depending on severity. Changes in the number of non-inflammatory, inflammatory, and total lesions and the proportion of acne severity after three months of therapy were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Among the 131 subjects, 63.4% had moderate acne; 20.6% had mild acne, and 16% had severe acne at baseline. Most patients (29 (22.2%)) received a combination of retinoic acid, benzoyl peroxide, and topical or oral antibiotics. Standard therapies reduced the median of non-inflammatory (25 (5-135) vs 8 (0-53)), inflammatory (10 (0-93) vs 2 (0-22)), and total lesions (41 (10-160) vs 10 (1-71)) at week 12 (all p < 0.001). The proportion of acne severity differed significantly after three months, with an increasing proportion of mild acne (20.6% vs 93.1%) and a decreasing percentage of moderate and severe acne (moderate = 63.6% vs 6.1%; severe, 16% vs 0.8%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Standard therapy for acne vulgaris based on the clinical practice guidelines in Indonesia improved acne lesions and severity after 12 weeks. These results support the implementation of national guidelines for acne management in Indonesia, with the practice of improving antimicrobial stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.