Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39364222›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in big data2024

Data-driven classification and explainable-AI in the field of lung imaging.

Syed Taimoor Hussain Shah, Syed Adil Hussain Shah, Iqra Iqbal Khan, Atif Imran, Syed Baqir Hussain Shah, Atif Mehmood, Shahzad Ahmad Qureshi, Mudassar Raza, Angelo Di Terlizzi, Marco Cavaglià and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in big data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Syed Taimoor Hussain Shah *PolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Syed Adil Hussain Shah *PolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Iqra Iqbal KhanDepartment of Computer Science, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Atif ImranCollege of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Syed Baqir Hussain ShahDepartment of Computer Science, Commission on Science and Technology for Sustainable Development in the South (COMSATS) University Islamabad (CUI), Wah Campus, Wah, Pakistan.
Atif MehmoodSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Shahzad Ahmad QureshiDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Mudassar RazaDepartment of Computer Science, Namal University Mianwali, Mianwali, Pakistan.
Angelo Di TerlizziDepartment of Research and Development (R&D), GPI SpA, Trento, Italy.
Marco CavagliàPolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Marco Agostino DeriuPolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting lung diseases in medical images can be quite challenging for radiologists. In some cases, even experienced experts may struggle with accurately diagnosing chest diseases, leading to potential inaccuracies due to complex or unseen biomarkers. This review paper delves into various datasets and machine learning techniques employed in recent research for lung disease classification, focusing on pneumonia analysis using chest X-ray images. We explore conventional machine learning methods, pretrained deep learning models, customized convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and ensemble methods. A comprehensive comparison of different classification approaches is presented, encompassing data acquisition, preprocessing, feature extraction, and classification using machine vision, machine and deep learning, and explainable-AI (XAI). Our analysis highlights the superior performance of transfer learning-based methods using CNNs and ensemble models/features for lung disease classification. In addition, our comprehensive review offers insights for researchers in other medical domains too who utilize radiological images. By providing a thorough overview of various techniques, our work enables the establishment of effective strategies and identification of suitable methods for a wide range of challenges. Currently, beyond traditional evaluation metrics, researchers emphasize the importance of XAI techniques in machine and deep learning models and their applications in classification tasks. This incorporation helps in gaining a deeper understanding of their decision-making processes, leading to improved trust, transparency, and overall clinical decision-making. Our comprehensive review serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners seeking not only to advance the field of lung disease detection using machine learning and XAI but also from other diverse domains.

Indexed as

chest X-ray imagesdeep learning modelsensemble methodsexplainable-AIfeature extractionpretrained deep learning modelstraditional machine learning

Identifiers

PMID39364222
PMCPMC11446784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.