ArticleObstetrics and gynecology international2024
Factors Influencing Induction of Labor Success in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The physiological process by which the fetus and placenta are delivered from the uterus and pass through the vaginal canal for delivery is known as labor. Induction of labor involves deliberately initiating labor before it occurs naturally, using medical interventions or techniques to stimulate contractions and initiate the birthing process. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the factors that influence the success of labor induction procedures in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from January to April 2023. Results: Five hundred and thirty-one pregnant women were analyzed. 52.7% were aged 30 years or below. The most common indication of IOL was post-dated pregnancy (26.2%). 62% were normal deliveries, indicative of IOL success, while 31.1% were cesarean deliveries, indicative of IOL failure. In univariate analysis, women with lower gravidity (≤3) and who had received Propess were associated with cesarean delivery. In a multivariate regression analysis, women who received Prostin and increased parity were identified as the significant independent predictors of IOL success. Conclusion: IOL's success was dependent primarily on increasing parity and Prostin administration. However, lower gravidity (≤3) and Propess medication could lead to operative procedures among pregnant women. Hence, it is necessary to carefully assess the condition of pregnant women before directing them to IOL.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.